234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22579446)
1. Quality in colonoscopy reporting: an assessment of compliance and performance improvement.
Coe SG; Panjala C; Heckman MG; Patel M; Qumseya BJ; Wang YR; Dalton B; Tran P; Palmer W; Diehl N; Wallace MB; Raimondo M
Dig Liver Dis; 2012 Aug; 44(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22579446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice.
de Jonge V; Sint Nicolaas J; Cahen DL; Moolenaar W; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; van Tilburg AJ; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 21907986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy.
Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Harrison ME; Leighton JA; Crowell MD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Sep; 76(3):603-8.e1. PubMed ID: 22732876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.
Radaelli F; Meucci G; Sgroi G; Minoli G;
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1122-30. PubMed ID: 18445096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation of quality of colonoscopy in Italy over five years: a nation-wide observational study.
Radaelli F; Paggi S; Minoli G
Dig Liver Dis; 2013 Jan; 45(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 22921044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia.
Beaulieu D; Barkun A; Martel M
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 18(27):3551-7. PubMed ID: 22826619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice.
Imperiali G; Minoli G; Meucci GM; Spinzi G; Strocchi E; Terruzzi V; Radaelli F
Endoscopy; 2007 Apr; 39(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 17273959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative.
Sanaka MR; Super DM; Feldman ES; Mullen KD; Ferguson DR; McCullough AJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jan; 63(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 16377324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment.
Overholt BF; Brooks-Belli L; Grace M; Rankin K; Harrell R; Turyk M; Rosenberg FB; Barish RW; Gilinsky NH;
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Apr; 44(4):e80-6. PubMed ID: 19881361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What are the sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic photographs in determining completion of colonoscopy? Results from an online questionnaire.
Thuraisingam AI; Brown JL; Anderson JT
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jun; 20(6):567-71. PubMed ID: 18467917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Images of the terminal ileum are more convincing than cecal images for verifying the extent of colonoscopy.
Powell N; Knight H; Dunn J; Saxena V; Mawdsley J; Murray C; Hoare J; Teare J; McNair A
Endoscopy; 2011 Mar; 43(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 21365513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up.
Colquhoun P; Chen HC; Kim JI; Efron J; Weiss EG; Nogueras JJ; Vernava AM; Wexner SD
Colorectal Dis; 2004 May; 6(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 15109378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of patient education on quality of bowel preparation in outpatient colonoscopies.
Modi C; Depasquale JR; Digiacomo WS; Malinowski JE; Engelhardt K; Shaikh SN; Kothari ST; Kottam R; Shakov R; Maksoud C; Baddoura WJ; Spira RS
Qual Prim Care; 2009; 17(6):397-404. PubMed ID: 20051190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quality indicators for colonoscopy: differences in polyp detection between endoscopists at one hospital].
van Lelyveld N; van Oijen MG; Schwartz MP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(24):A4219. PubMed ID: 22742441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Goalposts Have Moved: Can Surgery Residents Meet Updated Quality Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy?
Ortolani JB; Tershak DR; Ferrara JJ; Paget CJ
Am Surg; 2016 Sep; 82(9):835-8. PubMed ID: 27670573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality indicators for pediatric colonoscopy: results from a multicenter consortium.
Thakkar K; Holub JL; Gilger MA; Shub MD; McOmber M; Tsou M; Fishman DS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Mar; 83(3):533-41. PubMed ID: 26253014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practice and documentation of performance of colonoscopy in a central Canadian health region.
Singh H; Kaita L; Taylor G; Nugent Z; Bernstein C
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 28(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 24729991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality indicators in pediatric colonoscopy in a low-volume center: Implications for training.
Lee WS; Tee CW; Koay ZL; Wong TS; Zahraq F; Foo HW; Ong SY; Wong SY; Ng RT
World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Mar; 24(9):1013-1021. PubMed ID: 29531465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting in Usual Practice: Are Endoscopists Reporting Key Data Elements?
Hadlock SD; Liu N; Bernstein M; Gould M; Rabeneck L; Ruco A; Sutradhar R; Tinmouth JM
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016; 2016():1929361. PubMed ID: 27579299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colorectal surveillance interval assignment based on in vivo prediction of polyp histology: impact of endoscopic quality improvement program.
Coe SG; Thomas C; Crook J; Ussui V; Diehl N; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jul; 76(1):118-25.e1. PubMed ID: 22726470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
