124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22579945)
1. Qualitative study of prosthetic suspension systems on transtibial amputees' satisfaction and perceived problems with their prosthetic devices.
Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Naqshbandi MM; Eshraghi A; Kamyab M; Gholizadeh H
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 93(11):1919-23. PubMed ID: 22579945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Satisfaction and problems experienced with transfemoral suspension systems: a comparison between common suction socket and seal-in liner.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Yahyavi ES
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1584-9. PubMed ID: 23262380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study between Dermo, Pelite, and Seal-In X5 liners: effect on patient's satisfaction and perceived problems.
Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Arifin N; Gholizadeh H; Abd Razak NA; Abas WA
ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():769810. PubMed ID: 25184154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of a new prosthetic suspension system with two existing suspension systems for lower limb amputees.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Karimi MT; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Wan Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1028-38. PubMed ID: 23168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction.
Ali S; Osman NA; Mortaza N; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Nov; 27(9):943-8. PubMed ID: 22795863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between the suction suspension system and the hypobaric Iceross Seal-In® X5 in transtibial amputees.
Brunelli S; Delussu AS; Paradisi F; Pellegrini R; Traballesi M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Dec; 37(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 23436696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of suction and pin/lock suspension systems on transtibial amputees' gait performance.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e94520. PubMed ID: 24827560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transtibial prosthetic suspension: less pistoning versus easy donning and doffing.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Sævarsson SK; Wan Abas WA; Pirouzi GH
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(9):1321-30. PubMed ID: 23408214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: systematic review of literature.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Razak NA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 24315710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new approach for the pistoning measurement in transtibial prosthesis.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Lúvíksdóttir Á; Eshraghi A; Kamyab M; Wan Abas WA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 21975850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of a prosthetic suspension system: Looped silicone liner.
Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Eshraghi A; Wan Abas WAB
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):476-483. PubMed ID: 28946824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A questionnaire survey of the effect of different interface types on patient satisfaction and perceived problems among trans-tibial amputees.
Van de Weg FB; Van der Windt DA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 16466153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of two prosthetic suspension systems in a bilateral transtibial amputee.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Lúvíksdóttir AG; Wan Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Oct; 91(10):894-8. PubMed ID: 22173083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction.
Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Abd Razak NA; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013; 28(9-10):994-9. PubMed ID: 24161521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hygiene problems of residual limb and silicone liners in transtibial amputees wearing the total surface bearing socket.
Hachisuka K; Nakamura T; Ohmine S; Shitama H; Shinkoda K
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Sep; 82(9):1286-90. PubMed ID: 11552206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a powered ankle-foot prosthetic system during walking.
Ferris AE; Aldridge JM; Rábago CA; Wilken JM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 93(11):1911-8. PubMed ID: 22732369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. User experience of transtibial prosthetic liners: A systematic review.
Richardson A; Dillon MP
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Feb; 41(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 26932981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ground reaction force analysis in traumatic transtibial amputees' gait.
Kovac I; Medved V; Ostojić L
Coll Antropol; 2009 Dec; 33 Suppl 2():107-14. PubMed ID: 20120527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
