These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22580408)

  • 21. Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Dentale S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1542-57. PubMed ID: 22612161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes.
    Laub R; Frings C; Moeller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1474-1488. PubMed ID: 29687358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.
    Moeller B; Schächinger H; Frings C
    J Vis Exp; 2014 May; (87):. PubMed ID: 24893586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No sound is more distracting than the one you're trying not to hear: delayed costs of mental control of task-irrelevant neutral and emotional sounds.
    Kolbeinsson Ö; Asutay E; Enström M; Sand J; Hesser H
    BMC Psychol; 2022 Feb; 10(1):33. PubMed ID: 35189964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of distractor sounds presented through bone conduction headphones on the localization of critical environmental sounds.
    May KR; Walker BN
    Appl Ergon; 2017 May; 61():144-158. PubMed ID: 28237013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptual load does not modulate auditory distractor processing.
    Murphy S; Fraenkel N; Dalton P
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):345-55. PubMed ID: 23969299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.
    Moeller B; Frings C; Pfister R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):464-79. PubMed ID: 26501840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli-Distractor-response binding within and between the senses.
    Laub R; Merz S; Dröschel H; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2256-2266. PubMed ID: 33768482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When irrelevance matters: Stimulus-response binding in decision making under uncertainty.
    Nett N; Bröder A; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1831-48. PubMed ID: 26076329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neural correlates of auditory repetition priming: reduced fMRI activation in the auditory cortex.
    Bergerbest D; Ghahremani DG; Gabrieli JD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):966-77. PubMed ID: 15298784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception.
    McDonald JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Hillyard SA
    Nature; 2000 Oct; 407(6806):906-8. PubMed ID: 11057669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Affective matching moderates S-R binding.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Feb; 25(2):342-50. PubMed ID: 21432676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Specific foreknowledge reduces auditory distraction by irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):692-702. PubMed ID: 25621576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distractor-based stimulus-response bindings retrieve decisions independent of motor programs.
    Nett N; Bröder A; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Nov; 171():57-64. PubMed ID: 27665268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Priming inhibits the right ear advantage in dichotic listening: implications for auditory laterality.
    Saetrevik B; Hugdahl K
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):282-7. PubMed ID: 16996091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.
    Campbell T; Beaman CP; Berry DC
    Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):199-214. PubMed ID: 11958724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory location in the irrelevant sound effect: The effects of presenting auditory stimuli to either the left ear, right ear or both ears.
    Hadlington L; Bridges AM; Darby RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):545-57. PubMed ID: 15223201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distractor variation on auditory selective attention.
    Tong Y; Melara RD
    Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1166():110-23. PubMed ID: 17669371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of perceptual context on event-related brain potentials during auditory spatial attention.
    Arnott SR; Alain C
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Sep; 39(5):625-32. PubMed ID: 12236329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.