BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22581052)

  • 21. Microtrap electrode devices for single cell trapping and impedance measurement.
    Mondal D; Roychaudhuri C; Das L; Chatterjee J
    Biomed Microdevices; 2012 Oct; 14(5):955-64. PubMed ID: 22767244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Time course of electrical impedance during red blood cell aggregation in a glass tube: comparison with light transmittance.
    Baskurt OK; Uyuklu M; Meiselman HJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Apr; 57(4):969-78. PubMed ID: 19932990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Coincidence detection of heterogeneous cell populations from whole blood with coplanar electrodes in a microfluidic impedance cytometer.
    Hassan U; Bashir R
    Lab Chip; 2014 Nov; 14(22):4370-81. PubMed ID: 25231594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of red blood cells' dynamic status in a simulated blood circulation system using an ultrahigh-speed simultaneous framing optical electronic camera.
    Zhang Q; Li Z; Zhao S; Wen W; Chang L; Yu H; Jiang T
    Cytometry A; 2017 Feb; 91(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 27517614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A biomimetic microfluidic chip to study the circulation and mechanical retention of red blood cells in the spleen.
    Picot J; Ndour PA; Lefevre SD; El Nemer W; Tawfik H; Galimand J; Da Costa L; Ribeil JA; de Montalembert M; Brousse V; Le Pioufle B; Buffet P; Le Van Kim C; Français O
    Am J Hematol; 2015 Apr; 90(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 25641515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigation of critical shear stress with simultaneous measurement of electrical impedance, capacitance and light backscattering.
    Lee BK; Ko JY; Lim HJ; Nam JH; Shin S
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2012; 51(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 22240385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The potential of autofluorescence for the detection of single living cells for label-free cell sorting in microfluidic systems.
    Emmelkamp J; Wolbers F; Andersson H; Dacosta RS; Wilson BC; Vermes I; van den Berg A
    Electrophoresis; 2004 Nov; 25(21-22):3740-5. PubMed ID: 15565697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Direct measurement of the impact of impaired erythrocyte deformability on microvascular network perfusion in a microfluidic device.
    Shevkoplyas SS; Yoshida T; Gifford SC; Bitensky MW
    Lab Chip; 2006 Jul; 6(7):914-20. PubMed ID: 16804596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Flow behavior of fetal, neonatal and adult RBCs in narrow (3-6 μm) capillaries--Calculation and experimental application.
    Ruef P; Stadler AA; Poeschl J
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2014; 58(2):317-31. PubMed ID: 23313873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new floating electrode structure for generating homogeneous electrical fields in microfluidic channels.
    Segerink LI; Sprenkels AJ; Bomer JG; Vermes I; van den Berg A
    Lab Chip; 2011 Jun; 11(12):1995-2001. PubMed ID: 21279234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deformability measurement of red blood cells using a microfluidic channel array and an air cavity in a driving syringe with high throughput and precise detection of subpopulations.
    Kang YJ; Ha YR; Lee SJ
    Analyst; 2016 Jan; 141(1):319-30. PubMed ID: 26616556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Flow metering characterization within an electrical cell counting microfluidic device.
    Hassan U; Watkins NN; Edwards C; Bashir R
    Lab Chip; 2014 Apr; 14(8):1469-76. PubMed ID: 24615248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shear-dependent aggregation characteristics of red blood cells in a pressure-driven microfluidic channel.
    Shin S; Park MS; Ku YH; Suh JS
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2006; 34(1-2):353-61. PubMed ID: 16543657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Theoretical model and experimental study of red blood cell (RBC) deformation in microchannels.
    Korin N; Bransky A; Dinnar U
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(9):2088-95. PubMed ID: 17188279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electric impedance microflow cytometry for characterization of cell disease states.
    Du E; Ha S; Diez-Silva M; Dao M; Suresh S; Chandrakasan AP
    Lab Chip; 2013 Oct; 13(19):3903-3909. PubMed ID: 23925122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multiplexed fluidic plunger mechanism for the measurement of red blood cell deformability.
    Myrand-Lapierre ME; Deng X; Ang RR; Matthews K; Santoso AT; Ma H
    Lab Chip; 2015 Jan; 15(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 25325848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On chip droplet characterization: a practical, high-sensitivity measurement of droplet impedance in digital microfluidics.
    Sadeghi S; Ding H; Shah GJ; Chen S; Keng PY; Kim CJ; van Dam RM
    Anal Chem; 2012 Feb; 84(4):1915-23. PubMed ID: 22248060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantifying morphological heterogeneity: a study of more than 1 000 000 individual stored red blood cells.
    Piety NZ; Gifford SC; Yang X; Shevkoplyas SS
    Vox Sang; 2015 Oct; 109(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 25900518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dielectric characterization of
    Honrado C; Ciuffreda L; Spencer D; Ranford-Cartwright L; Morgan H
    J R Soc Interface; 2018 Oct; 15(147):. PubMed ID: 30333248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microfluidic impedance cytometry device with N-shaped electrodes for lateral position measurement of single cells/particles.
    Yang D; Ai Y
    Lab Chip; 2019 Nov; 19(21):3609-3617. PubMed ID: 31517354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.