310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22582049)
1. Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.
Yanagawa M; Tatsumi M; Miyata H; Morii E; Tomiyama N; Watabe T; Isohashi K; Kato H; Shimosegawa E; Yamasaki M; Mori M; Doki Y; Hatazawa J
J Nucl Med; 2012 Jun; 53(6):872-80. PubMed ID: 22582049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT - RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.
Odawara S; Kitajima K; Katsuura T; Kurahashi Y; Shinohara H; Yamakado K
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():65-71. PubMed ID: 29571803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of response to stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.
Han J; Song Q; Guo F; Du R; Fang H; Kang J; Lu Z
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Jun; 43(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 35354781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PET/CT evaluation of response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST).
Ding Q; Cheng X; Yang L; Zhang Q; Chen J; Li T; Shi H
J Thorac Dis; 2014 Jun; 6(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24976990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PET response criteria in solid tumors predicts progression-free survival and time to local or distant progression after chemotherapy with regional hyperthermia for soft-tissue sarcoma.
Fendler WP; Lehmann M; Todica A; Herrmann K; Knösel T; Angele MK; Dürr HR; Rauch J; Bartenstein P; Cyran CC; Hacker M; Lindner LH
J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):530-7. PubMed ID: 25722445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of RECIST, EORTC criteria and PERCIST for evaluation of early response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Shang J; Ling X; Zhang L; Tang Y; Xiao Z; Cheng Y; Guo B; Gong J; Huang L; Xu H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Oct; 43(11):1945-53. PubMed ID: 27236466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of extremities: PERCIST versus RECIST 1.1 criteria after long-term follow-up.
Xu J; Li Y; Xie L; Sun X; Cai Z; Wang S; Wang Q; Sun K; Guo W
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 36(6):553-561. PubMed ID: 35380350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lack of fludeoxyglucose F 18 uptake in posttreatment positron emission tomography as a significant predictor of survival after subsequent surgery in multimodality treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Higuchi I; Yasuda T; Yano M; Doki Y; Miyata H; Tatsumi M; Fukunaga H; Takiguchi S; Fujiwara Y; Hatazawa J; Monden M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jul; 136(1):205-12, 212.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18603077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of response evaluation to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Makino T; Miyata H; Yamasaki M; Fujiwara Y; Takiguchi S; Nakajima K; Higuchi I; Hatazawa J; Mori M; Doki Y
Surgery; 2010 Nov; 148(5):908-18. PubMed ID: 20378140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tumor/normal esophagus ratio in (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for response and prognosis stratification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Izumi D; Yoshida N; Watanabe M; Shiraishi S; Ishimoto T; Kosumi K; Tokunaga R; Taki K; Higashi T; Harada K; Miyata T; Ida S; Imamura Y; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Sakamoto Y; Miyamoto Y; Yamashita Y; Baba H
J Gastroenterol; 2016 Aug; 51(8):788-95. PubMed ID: 26671045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic Significance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET)-Positive Lymph Nodes Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery for Resectable Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Yasuda T; Yano M; Miyata H; Yamasaki M; Takiguchi S; Fujiwara Y; Doki Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 22(8):2599-607. PubMed ID: 25524011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer.
Swisher SG; Maish M; Erasmus JJ; Correa AM; Ajani JA; Bresalier R; Komaki R; Macapinlac H; Munden RF; Putnam JB; Rice D; Smythe WR; Vaporciyan AA; Walsh GL; Wu TT; Roth JA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Oct; 78(4):1152-60; discussion 1152-60. PubMed ID: 15464463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ineffectiveness of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of tumor response after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer.
Piessen G; Petyt G; Duhamel A; Mirabel X; Huglo D; Mariette C
Ann Surg; 2013 Jul; 258(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 23470576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for potentially resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer.
Metser U; Rashidi F; Moshonov H; Wong R; Knox J; Guindi M; Darling G
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 24474598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.
Skougaard K; Nielsen D; Jensen BV; Hendel HW
J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23572497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using MRI and FDG-PET/CT-RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.
Kitajima K; Miyoshi Y; Yamano T; Odawara S; Higuchi T; Yamakado K
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2018 May; 80(2):183-197. PubMed ID: 29915436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival predicted by ([18F])FDG-PET/CT.
Kauppi JT; Oksala N; Salo JA; Helin H; Karhumäki L; Kemppainen J; Sihvo EI; Räsänen JV
Acta Oncol; 2012 May; 51(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 22208782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting tumor response and prognosis to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients using PERCIST: a multicenter study in Japan.
Kaida H; Kitajima K; Nakajo M; Ishibashi M; Matsunaga T; Minamimoto R; Hirata K; Nakatani K; Hung A; Hattori S; Yasuda T; Ishii K
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Oct; 48(11):3666-3682. PubMed ID: 33934168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tumor budding in tumor invasive front predicts prognosis and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Miyata H; Yoshioka A; Yamasaki M; Nushijima Y; Takiguchi S; Fujiwara Y; Nishida T; Mano M; Mori M; Doki Y
Cancer; 2009 Jul; 115(14):3324-34. PubMed ID: 19452547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usefulness of
Yokose T; Kitago M; Matsusaka Y; Masugi Y; Shinoda M; Yagi H; Abe Y; Oshima G; Hori S; Endo Y; Toyama K; Iwabuchi Y; Takemura R; Ishii R; Nakahara T; Okuda S; Jinzaki M; Kitagawa Y
Cancer Med; 2020 Jun; 9(12):4059-4068. PubMed ID: 32281301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
