These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22582727)

  • 1. Test publishers' perspective on "an updated meta-analysis": comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012).
    Harris WG; Jones JW; Klion R; Arnold DW; Camara W; Cunningham MR
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 22582727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrity tests predict counterproductive work behaviors and job performance well: comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012).
    Ones DS; Viswesvaran C; Schmidt FL
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):537-42. PubMed ID: 22582728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On reconciling conflicting meta-analytic findings regarding integrity test validity.
    Sackett PR; Schmitt N
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):550-6. PubMed ID: 22582730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):499-530. PubMed ID: 21319880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The critical role of the research question, inclusion criteria, and transparency in meta-analyses of integrity test research: a reply to Harris et al. (2012) and Ones, Viswesvaran, and Schmidt (2012).
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):543-9; discussion 531-6, 537-42. PubMed ID: 22582729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personnel selection: looking toward the future--remembering the past.
    Hough LM; Oswald FL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2000; 51():631-64. PubMed ID: 10751983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-employment integrity testing across multiple industries.
    Fine S
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 21117489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incremental validity of person-organization fit over the Big Five personality measures.
    Tsai WC; Chen HY; Chen CC
    J Psychol; 2012; 146(5):485-509. PubMed ID: 22931006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Putka DJ; Lanivich SE
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1167-94. PubMed ID: 21744941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100.
    Patterson F; Zibarras L; Ashworth V
    Med Teach; 2016; 38(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 26313700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of the testing situation on item responding: cause for concern.
    Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Chan KY; Lee WC; Drasgow F
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):943-53. PubMed ID: 11596810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews.
    Huffcutt AI; Conway JM; Roth PL; Stone NJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):897-913. PubMed ID: 11596806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Campbell JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 20919794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retesting after initial failure, coaching rumors, and warnings against faking in online personality measures for selection.
    Landers RN; Sackett PR; Tuzinski KA
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):202-10. PubMed ID: 20718510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings.
    Schmitt N; Oswald FL
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):613-21. PubMed ID: 16737358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries.
    Murphy KR; Dzieweczynski JL; Zhang Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1018-31. PubMed ID: 19594241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance.
    McCarthy JM; Van Iddekinge CH; Lievens F; Kung MC; Sinar EF; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Sep; 98(5):701-19. PubMed ID: 23937298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: understanding the practical importance of differences between groups.
    Nye CD; Drasgow F
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):966-80. PubMed ID: 21463015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health Care Providers Inventory: a method for evaluating nursing aides.
    Beach DA
    J Psychol; 1988 Jan; 122(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 3373450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
    Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.