These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22582728)

  • 1. Integrity tests predict counterproductive work behaviors and job performance well: comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012).
    Ones DS; Viswesvaran C; Schmidt FL
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):537-42. PubMed ID: 22582728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test publishers' perspective on "an updated meta-analysis": comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012).
    Harris WG; Jones JW; Klion R; Arnold DW; Camara W; Cunningham MR
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 22582727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On reconciling conflicting meta-analytic findings regarding integrity test validity.
    Sackett PR; Schmitt N
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):550-6. PubMed ID: 22582730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):499-530. PubMed ID: 21319880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The critical role of the research question, inclusion criteria, and transparency in meta-analyses of integrity test research: a reply to Harris et al. (2012) and Ones, Viswesvaran, and Schmidt (2012).
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):543-9; discussion 531-6, 537-42. PubMed ID: 22582729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personnel selection: looking toward the future--remembering the past.
    Hough LM; Oswald FL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2000; 51():631-64. PubMed ID: 10751983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-employment integrity testing across multiple industries.
    Fine S
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 21117489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using individual differences to predict job performance: correcting for direct and indirect restriction of range.
    Sjöberg S; Sjöberg A; Näswall K; Sverke M
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 22612634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations.
    Cao M; Drasgow F
    J Appl Psychol; 2019 Nov; 104(11):1347-1368. PubMed ID: 31070382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing and interpreting interaction effects: A reply to Vancouver, Carlson, Dhanani, and Colton (2021).
    Van Iddekinge CH; Aguinis H; LeBreton JM; Mackey JD; DeOrtentiis PS
    J Appl Psychol; 2021 Mar; 106(3):476-488. PubMed ID: 33871272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incremental validity of person-organization fit over the Big Five personality measures.
    Tsai WC; Chen HY; Chen CC
    J Psychol; 2012; 146(5):485-509. PubMed ID: 22931006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Prorating Method for Estimating MMPI-2-RF Scores From MMPI Responses: Examination of Score Fidelity and Illustration of Empirical Utility in the PERSEREC Police Integrity Study Sample.
    Tarescavage AM; Corey DM; Ben-Porath YS
    Assessment; 2016 Apr; 23(2):173-90. PubMed ID: 25848124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A meta-analysis of the relationship between individual assessments and job performance.
    Morris SB; Daisley RL; Wheeler M; Boyer P
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Jan; 100(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 24865578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries.
    Murphy KR; Dzieweczynski JL; Zhang Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1018-31. PubMed ID: 19594241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Putka DJ; Lanivich SE
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1167-94. PubMed ID: 21744941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: understanding the practical importance of differences between groups.
    Nye CD; Drasgow F
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):966-80. PubMed ID: 21463015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits.
    Credé M; Harms P; Niehorster S; Gaye-Valentine A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Apr; 102(4):874-88. PubMed ID: 22352328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Campbell JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 20919794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validity of general cognitive ability predicting job-specific performance is stable across different levels of job experience.
    Hambrick DZ; Burgoyne AP; Oswald FL
    J Appl Psychol; 2024 Mar; 109(3):437-455. PubMed ID: 37843546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews.
    Huffcutt AI; Conway JM; Roth PL; Stone NJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):897-913. PubMed ID: 11596806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.