167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22582866)
1. A mixed model approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies with binary test outcome.
Doebler P; Holling H; Böhning D
Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):418-36. PubMed ID: 22582866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
Nikoloulopoulos AK
Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
Rücker G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
Macaskill P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and ROC Curves with Covariate Adjusted Semiparametric Mixtures.
Doebler P; Holling H
Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):1084-104. PubMed ID: 25361619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Procedures for performing meta-analyses of the accuracy of tools for binary classification].
Botella J; Huang H
Psicothema; 2012 Feb; 24(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 22269376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A procedure for determining whether a simple combination of diagnostic tests may be noninferior to the theoretical optimum combination.
Jin H; Lu Y
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 18556633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses--clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlation.
Schlattmann P; Verba M; Dewey M; Walther M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 25441701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference.
Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Schmid CH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():8-17. PubMed ID: 28063915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Moses-Littenberg meta-analytical method generates systematic differences in test accuracy compared to hierarchical meta-analytical models.
Dinnes J; Mallett S; Hopewell S; Roderick PJ; Deeks JJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():77-87. PubMed ID: 27485293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer.
Gatsonis C; Paliwal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):271-81. PubMed ID: 16861527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques in the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Jones CM; Athanasiou T
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jan; 79(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 15620907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
