These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22583060)

  • 1. Combining experts' judgments: comparison of algorithmic methods using synthetic data.
    Hammitt JK; Zhang Y
    Risk Anal; 2013 Jan; 33(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 22583060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of expert judgment in exposure assessment: part 2. Calibration of expert judgments about personal exposures to benzene.
    Walker KD; Catalano P; Hammitt JK; Evans JS
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 13(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12595879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of expert judgment in exposure assessment. Part I. Characterization of personal exposure to benzene.
    Walker KD; Evans JS; MacIntosh D
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2001; 11(4):308-22. PubMed ID: 11571610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expert judgement in a risk assessment model for Salmonella spp. in pork: the performance of different weighting schemes.
    Boone I; Van der Stede Y; Bollaerts K; Messens W; Vose D; Daube G; Aerts M; Mintiens K
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Nov; 92(3):224-34. PubMed ID: 19782415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing the waters: An investigation of the impact of hot tubbing on experts from referral through testimony.
    Perillo JT; Perillo AD; Despodova NM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):229-242. PubMed ID: 34351205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science.
    Martin TG; Burgman MA; Fidler F; Kuhnert PM; Low-Choy S; McBride M; Mengersen K
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 22280323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy.
    Morgan MG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 May; 111(20):7176-84. PubMed ID: 24821779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elicitation of quantitative data from a heterogeneous expert panel: formal process and application in animal health.
    Van der Fels-Klerx IH; Goossens LH; Saatkamp HW; Horst SH
    Risk Anal; 2002 Feb; 22(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 12017363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a Performance-Based Expert Elicitation: WHO Global Attribution of Foodborne Diseases.
    Aspinall WP; Cooke RM; Havelaar AH; Hoffmann S; Hald T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149817. PubMed ID: 26930595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining experts' risk judgments on technology performance of phytoremediation: self-confidence ratings, averaging procedures, and formative consensus building.
    Scholz RW; Hansmann R
    Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):225-40. PubMed ID: 17362411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert.
    Cooper J; Hall J
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 11180418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Group elicitations yield more consistent, yet more uncertain experts in understanding risks to ecosystem services in New Zealand bays.
    Singh GG; Sinner J; Ellis J; Kandlikar M; Halpern BS; Satterfield T; Chan K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182233. PubMed ID: 28767694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application and Evaluation of an Expert Judgment Elicitation Procedure for Correlations.
    Zondervan-Zwijnenburg M; van de Schoot-Hubeek W; Lek K; Hoijtink H; van de Schoot R
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():90. PubMed ID: 28197115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reliability of experts' opinions in constructing a composite environmental index: the case of ESI 2005.
    Giannetti BF; Bonilla SH; Silva CC; Almeida CM
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2448-59. PubMed ID: 19285781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization and quantification of the skin radiance through new digital image analysis.
    Baret M; Bensimon N; Coronel S; Ventura S; Nicolas-Garcia S; Korichi R; Gazano G
    Skin Res Technol; 2006 Nov; 12(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 17026656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for combining experts' probability assessments.
    Jacobs RA
    Neural Comput; 1995 Sep; 7(5):867-88. PubMed ID: 7584890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of expert opinion for animal disease decisions: an example of foot-and-mouth disease status designation.
    Garabed RB; Perez AM; Johnson WO; Thurmond MC
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Nov; 92(1-2):20-30. PubMed ID: 19651451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a structured expert elicitation estimating the proportion of illness acquired by foodborne transmission for nine enteric pathogens in Australia.
    Vally H; Glass K; Ford L; Hall G; Kirk MD; Shadbolt C; Veitch MG; Fullerton KE; Musto J; Becker N
    Epidemiol Infect; 2016 Apr; 144(5):897-906. PubMed ID: 26455517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The role of the Medical Scientific Council's Forensic Committee in the consent judgments regarding private insurance companies].
    Horváth J
    Orv Hetil; 2008 Aug; 149(31):1457-62. PubMed ID: 18632506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Bayesian non-inferiority approach using experts' margin elicitation - application to the monitoring of safety events.
    Aupiais C; Alberti C; Schmitz T; Baud O; Ursino M; Zohar S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):187. PubMed ID: 31533631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.