268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22583107)
1. Ovarian remnant syndrome: comparison of laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery.
Zapardiel I; Zanagnolo V; Kho RM; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Aug; 91(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 22583107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Magrina JF; Cetta RL; Chang YH; Guevara G; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 May; 129(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 23357611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ovarian remnant syndrome: diagnostic difficulties and management].
Fat BC; Terzibachian JJ; Bertrand V; Leung F; de Lapparent T; Grisey A; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Jun; 37(6):488-94. PubMed ID: 19457698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ovarian remnant syndrome.
Magtibay PM; Nyholm JL; Hernandez JL; Podratz KC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 193(6):2062-6. PubMed ID: 16325616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathologic findings and outcomes of a minimally invasive approach to ovarian remnant syndrome.
Kho RM; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM
Fertil Steril; 2007 May; 87(5):1005-9. PubMed ID: 17478171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer.
Tang KY; Gardiner SK; Gould C; Osmundsen B; Collins M; Winter WE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):513.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22409959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Magrina JF; Kho RM; Weaver AL; Montero RP; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18279944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes TL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 20303834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Retrospective and comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy].
Farache C; Alonso S; Ferrer Marsollier C; Masia F; de Tayrac R; Triopon G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 22542372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers.
Woo Y; Hyung WJ; Pak KH; Inaba K; Obama K; Choi SH; Noh SH
Arch Surg; 2011 Sep; 146(9):1086-92. PubMed ID: 21576595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic management of ovarian remnant.
Nezhat C; Kearney S; Malik S; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Fertil Steril; 2005 Apr; 83(4):973-8. PubMed ID: 15820809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
Coronado PJ; Herraiz MA; Magrina JF; Fasero M; Vidart JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22819573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgery of borderline tumors of the ovary: retrospective comparison of short-term outcome after laparoscopy or laparotomy.
Ødegaard E; Staff AC; Langebrekke A; Engh V; Onsrud M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 17464594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
