BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22583986)

  • 1. Currently available quality improvement initiatives in surgical oncology.
    Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2012 Jul; 21(3):367-75, vii. PubMed ID: 22583986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of care indicators for prostate cancer: progress toward consensus.
    Miller DC; Saigal CS
    Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(4):427-34. PubMed ID: 19573774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
    Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
    Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical cancer advances 2011: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
    Vogelzang NJ; Benowitz SI; Adams S; Aghajanian C; Chang SM; Dreyer ZE; Janne PA; Ko AH; Masters GA; Odenike O; Patel JD; Roth BJ; Samlowski WE; Seidman AD; Tap WD; Temel JS; Von Roenn JH; Kris MG
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jan; 30(1):88-109. PubMed ID: 22147736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advancing performance measurement in oncology.
    Campion FX; Larson LR; Kadlubek PJ; Earle CC; Neuss MN
    Am J Manag Care; 2011 May; 17 Suppl 5 Developing():SP32-6. PubMed ID: 21711075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assessment in oncology.
    Albert JM; Das P
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jul; 83(3):773-81. PubMed ID: 22445001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring the improving quality of outpatient care in medical oncology practices in the United States.
    Neuss MN; Malin JL; Chan S; Kadlubek PJ; Adams JL; Jacobson JO; Blayney DW; Simone JV
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Apr; 31(11):1471-7. PubMed ID: 23478057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center.
    Blayney DW; McNiff K; Hanauer D; Miela G; Markstrom D; Neuss M
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 27(23):3802-7. PubMed ID: 19487377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality improvement in surgical oncology - measuring and improving clinical outcomes.
    Simunovic M; Baxter N
    Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 20(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 21392965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: Part 1--history, rationale, consequences.
    Shahian DM; Edwards FH; Jacobs JP; Prager RL; Normand SL; Shewan CM; O'Brien SM; Peterson ED; Grover FL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 92(3 Suppl):S2-11. PubMed ID: 21867789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving cancer care through public reporting of meaningful quality measures.
    Spinks TE; Walters R; Feeley TW; Albright HW; Jordan VS; Bingham J; Burke TW
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Apr; 30(4):664-72. PubMed ID: 21471487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality management in oncology].
    Enghofer E
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1999 Jan; 93(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 10198971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of patient-reported outcomes in evaluating the quality of oncology care.
    Dennison CR
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Dec; 8(18 Suppl):S580-6. PubMed ID: 12512982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The opportunity and strategy for quality and health-system improvement now and in the future.
    Sherar M; Maley O
    Healthc Q; 2015; 17 Spec No():52-6. PubMed ID: 25562136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Missing data and interpretation of cancer surgery outcomes at the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Parsons HM; Henderson WG; Ziegenfuss JY; Davern M; Al-Refaie WB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Sep; 213(3):379-91. PubMed ID: 21700480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of quality assurance in surgical oncology in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
    Landheer ML; Therasse P; van de Velde CJ
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2001 Oct; 10(4):885-914, x. PubMed ID: 11641097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base.
    Bilimoria KY; Bentrem DJ; Stewart AK; Winchester DP; Ko CY
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Sep; 27(25):4177-81. PubMed ID: 19636004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality measures, standards, and accreditation for breast centers in the United States.
    Moran MS; Goss D; Haffty BG; Kaufman CS; Winchester DP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jan; 76(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20005450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the status of thoracic surgical research and quality improvement programs: a survey of the members of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons.
    Ivanovic J; Maziak DE; Gilbert S; Shamji FM; Sundaresan RS; Ramsay T; Seely AJ
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 21708361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance metrics in oncology.
    Barr TR
    Am J Manag Care; 2013; 19 Spec No. 3():E7. PubMed ID: 23725328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.