165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22584452)
1. A comparison of dental ultrasonic technologies on subgingival calculus removal: a pilot study.
Silva LB; Hodges KO; Calley KH; Seikel JA
J Dent Hyg; 2012; 86(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 22584452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument.
Busslinger A; Lampe K; Beuchat M; Lehmann B
J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 11422585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients' perception of pain during ultrasonic debridement: a comparison between piezoelectric and magnetostrictive scalers.
Muhney KA; Dechow PC
J Dent Hyg; 2010; 84(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 21047464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.
Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I
Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips.
Yukna RA; Scott JB; Aichelmann-Reidy ME; LeBlanc DM; Mayer ET
J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Tartar removal by hand instruments and by ultrasonic apparatus. Current approaches and recent findings].
Picarelli A; Alessio R; Fossato L
Minerva Stomatol; 1984; 33(5):801-9. PubMed ID: 6394984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of the Titan-S sonic scaler versus curettes in the removal of subgingival calculus. A human surgical evaluation.
Gellin RG; Miller MC; Javed T; Engler WO; Mishkin DJ
J Periodontol; 1986 Nov; 57(11):672-80. PubMed ID: 3550033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Ultrasonic and sonic scalers in periodontics. A review].
Thilo B; Chapuis B; Pernet D; Baehni P
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 2181646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of various ultrasonic devices for the removal of dental calculus].
Spranger H
ZWR; 1976 Feb; 85(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 1062090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Dental hygienists' perception of preparation and use for ultrasonic instrumentation.
Asadoorian J; Botbyl D; Goulding MJ
Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 Feb; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 25040431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of calculus detection among dental hygienists using an explorer and ultrasonic insert.
Partido BB; Webb CA; Carr MP
Int J Dent Hyg; 2019 May; 17(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 30714331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness of two sonic and two ultrasonic scaler tips in furcations.
Patterson M; Eick JD; Eberhart AB; Gross K; Killoy WJ
J Periodontol; 1989 Jun; 60(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 2674397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ultrasonic to hand instruments in the removal of subgingival plaque.
Thornton S; Garnick J
J Periodontol; 1982 Jan; 53(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 6948949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Efficacy of Calculus Detection Between Ultrasonic Inserts and an Explorer.
Partido BB; Webb C; Carr MP
J Dent Hyg; 2018 Dec; 92(6):33-39. PubMed ID: 30643002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ultrasonic and hand instruments for the removal of calculus.
Stewart JL; Drisko RR; Herlach AD
J Am Dent Assoc; 1967 Jul; 75(1):153-7. PubMed ID: 5298016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
Drisko CH
Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficiency of the Vector -system compared with conventional subgingival debridement in vitro and in vivo.
Braun A; Krause F; Hartschen V; Falk W; Jepsen S
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Aug; 33(8):568-74. PubMed ID: 16899100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subjective intensity of pain during ultrasonic supragingival calculus removal.
Braun A; Jepsen S; Krause F
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Aug; 34(8):668-72. PubMed ID: 17535284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Absence of histologic signs of chronic inflammation following closed subgingival scaling and root planing using the dental endoscope: human biopsies - a pilot study.
Wilson TG; Carnio J; Schenk R; Myers G
J Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):2036-41. PubMed ID: 18980510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
