214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22584857)
1. [Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after segmental transverse cesarean surgery].
Bazzo JM; Tambara EM; Campos AC; Feijó Rde P
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2012 May; 34(5):221-7. PubMed ID: 22584857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position.
Wang CB; Chiu WW; Lee CY; Sun YL; Lin YH; Tseng CJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 19565535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transabdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound to assess the thickness of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean section.
Nagy Afifi A; Ahmed Taymour M; Mamdouh El-Khayat W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():145-151. PubMed ID: 35203047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [UTERINE SCAR DEFECT IN WOMEN AFTER CESAREAN SECTION - ULTRASOUND AND HYSTEROSCOPIC DIAGNOSI.].
Ganovska A; Kovachev S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 2():9-14. PubMed ID: 29470866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after Cesarean section and next birth.
Basic E; Basic-Cetkovic V; Kozaric H; Rama A
Med Arch; 2012; 66(3 Suppl 1):41-4. PubMed ID: 22937691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.
Ofili-Yebovi D; Ben-Nagi J; Sawyer E; Yazbek J; Lee C; Gonzalez J; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 31(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 18061960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy.
Fabres C; Aviles G; De La Jara C; Escalona J; Muñoz JF; Mackenna A; Fernández C; Zegers-Hochschild F; Fernández E
J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Jul; 22(7):695-700; quiz 701-2. PubMed ID: 12862268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetrical outcomes after vaginal repair of caesarean scar diverticula in reproductive-aged women.
Zhou X; Yang X; Chen H; Fang X; Wang X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):407. PubMed ID: 30340551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus].
Zimmer M; Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Tomiałowicz M; Michniewicz J; Wiatrowski A; Mikołajczyk K
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Nov; 78(11):842-6. PubMed ID: 18306913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars.
Ryo E; Sakurai R; Kamata H; Seto M; Morita M; Ayabe T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Apr; 43(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 27033868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Kliucinskas M; Paskauskas S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 35334583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Second-trimester sonographic comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without a previous cesarean delivery.
Sambaziotis H; Conway C; Figueroa R; Elimian A; Garry D
J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Jul; 23(7):907-11; quiz 913-4. PubMed ID: 15292558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.
Zhou X; Zhang T; Qiao H; Zhang Y; Wang X
BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 33985487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hysteroscopic and laparoscopic management of uterine defects on previous cesarean delivery scars.
Li C; Guo Y; Liu Y; Cheng J; Zhang W
J Perinat Med; 2014 May; 42(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 24310769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.
Budny-Winska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 33757154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic repair of a symptomatic post-cesarean section isthmocele: a video case report.
Aimi G; Buggio L; Berlanda N; Vercellini P
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jun; 107(6):e17-e18. PubMed ID: 28483506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
