BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22585459)

  • 1. First trimester transabdominal chorionic villus sampling--does the needle matter?
    Wax JR; Cartin A; Chard R; Carpenter M; Pinette MG
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2012 Sep; 40(7):385-8. PubMed ID: 22585459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pain experience during chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a preliminary study.
    Vandenbossche F; Horovitz J; Guyon F; Verret C; Saura R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Feb; 136(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 17499418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Chorionic villus needle sampling by the transabdominal route or by placental centesis. A series of 930 cases].
    Guidicelli B; Levy A; Piquet C; Gamerre M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(8):851-5. PubMed ID: 8132961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison between transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling in clinical application for prenatal diagnosis].
    Luo YM; Fang Q; Yang YZ; Chen JH; Chen ML; Chen YZ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 43(11):814-7. PubMed ID: 19087562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized comparison of transcervical and transabdominal chorionic-villus sampling. The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Chorionic-Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis Study Group.
    Jackson LG; Zachary JM; Fowler SE; Desnick RJ; Golbus MS; Ledbetter DH; Mahoney MJ; Pergament E; Simpson JL; Black S
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):594-8. PubMed ID: 1640952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decreasing risk of pregnancy loss following chorionic villus sampling. Elimination of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling during the ninth week of pregnancy.
    Ginsberg NA; Applebaum M; Bozorgi N; Cadkin AV; Verlinsky Y; Strom CM
    J Reprod Med; 1992 Oct; 37(10):853-6. PubMed ID: 1479567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More chorionic villi obtained at a single center compared to previously published reports.
    Vora N; Hardisty E; Asiaii A; Wolfberg A; Borrell A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jan; 28(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 24597734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. First-trimester fetal reduction to a singleton infant or twins: outcome in relation to the final number and karyotyping before reduction by transabdominal chorionic villus sampling.
    Brambati B; Tului L; Camurri L; Guercilena S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):2035-40. PubMed ID: 15592288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized study to assess two different techniques of aspiration while performing transabdominal chorionic villus sampling.
    Battagliarin G; Lanna M; Coviello D; Tassis B; Quarenghi A; Nicolini U
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 19016569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Randomized comparison of transabdominal, transcervical chorionic villi sampling and amniocentesis].
    Smidt-Jensen SL; Permin M; Philip J; Lundsteen C; GrĂ¼ning LK; Zachary JM; Fowler SE
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 May; 155(19):1446-56. PubMed ID: 8316971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early second trimester (13 to 20 weeks) transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (TA-CVS): a safe and alternative method for both high and low risk populations.
    Brambati B; Tului L; Camurri L; Guercilena S
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Oct; 22(10):907-13. PubMed ID: 12378575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First-trimester transcervical chorionic villus sampling by biopsy forceps versus mid-trimester amniocentesis: a randomized controlled trial project.
    Borrell A; Fortuny A; Lazaro L; Costa D; Seres A; Pappa S; Soler A
    Prenat Diagn; 1999 Dec; 19(12):1138-42. PubMed ID: 10590432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pain associated with chorionic villus sampling: transabdominal vs transcervical approach.
    Wax JR; Davies NP; Watson WJ; Cartin A; Pinette MG; Chard R; Carpenter M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 201(4):400.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19683693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chorionic villus sampling: transabdominal versus transcervical approach in more than 4000 cases.
    Hallak M; Johnson MP; Pryde PG; Isada NB; Zador IE; Evans MI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):349-52. PubMed ID: 1495690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How painful are amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling?
    Csaba A; Bush MC; Saphier C
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jan; 26(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16378331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initiating a chorionic villus sampling program. Relying on placental location as the primary determinant of the sampling route.
    Silver RK; MacGregor SN; Sholl JS; Elesh RH; Beaird JA; Waldee JK
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):964-8. PubMed ID: 2246764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations: a comparison between second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling.
    Wapner RJ; Johnson A; Davis G; Urban A; Morgan P; Jackson L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 82(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8515925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcome of first-trimester chorionic villus sampling for genetic investigation in multiple pregnancy.
    Brambati B; Tului L; Guercilena S; Alberti E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 17(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 11309169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss.
    Caughey AB; Hopkins LM; Norton ME
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):612-6. PubMed ID: 16946222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The transvaginal probe as a uterine manipulator: a new technique to simplify transabdominal chorionic villus sampling in cases with difficult access to the trophoblast.
    Bertucci E; Pati M; Cani C; Volpe A; Mazza V
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Sep; 31(9):897-900. PubMed ID: 21706512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.