243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22587373)
1. Nomograms to predict the pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men: comparison with western predictive tools using decision curve analysis.
Jeong CW; Jeong SJ; Hong SK; Lee SB; Ku JH; Byun SS; Jeong H; Kwak C; Kim HH; Lee E; Lee SE
Int J Urol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):846-52. PubMed ID: 22587373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update.
Partin AW; Kattan MW; Subong EN; Walsh PC; Wojno KJ; Oesterling JE; Scardino PT; Pearson JD
JAMA; 1997 May; 277(18):1445-51. PubMed ID: 9145716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive ability of partin tables 2001 in a Welsh population.
Ayyathurai R; Ananthakrishnan K; Rajasundaram R; Knight RJ; Toussi H; Srinivasan V
Urol Int; 2006; 76(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 16601382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Horiguchi A; Nakashima J; Horiguchi Y; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Marumo K; Murai M
Prostate; 2003 Jun; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12746843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Montie JE; Pearson JD; Slezak JM; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1591-5. PubMed ID: 11025711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nomograms for the prediction of pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men.
Song C; Kang T; Ro JY; Lee MS; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Korean Med Sci; 2005 Apr; 20(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 15831998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer.
Cagiannos I; Karakiewicz P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Rabbani F; Gerigk C; Reuter V; Graefen M; Hammerer PG; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Kupelian P; Klein E; Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD; Morash CG; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1798-803. PubMed ID: 14532779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the partin nomogram for prostate cancer in a national sample.
Yu JB; Makarov DV; Sharma R; Peschel RE; Partin AW; Gross CP
J Urol; 2010 Jan; 183(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 19913246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Augustin H; Eggert T; Wenske S; Karakiewicz PI; Palisaar J; Daghofer F; Huland H; Graefen M
J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 14665871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.
Makarov DV; Trock BJ; Humphreys EB; Mangold LA; Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Partin AW
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 17572194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.
Abdollah F; Schmitges J; Sun M; Thuret R; Djahangirian O; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Briganti A; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 22137704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is body mass index associated with pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in Korean men?
Lee SE; Lee WK; Jeong MS; Abdullajanov M; Kim DS; Park HZ; Jeong SJ; Yoon CY; Byun SS; Choe G; Hong SK
BJU Int; 2011 Apr; 107(8):1250-5. PubMed ID: 20880194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of 2001 Partin tables in Turkey: a multicenter study.
Eskicorapci SY; Karabulut E; Türkeri L; Baltaci S; Cal C; Toktas G; Akpinar H; Ozer G; Sozen S; Tokuc R; Lekili M; Soylu A; Albayrak S; Sahin H; Alpar R; Ozen H
Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 15661412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decision curve analysis to compare 3 versions of Partin Tables to predict final pathologic stage.
Augustin H; Sun M; Isbarn H; Pummer K; Karakiewicz P
Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 20884254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
