131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2258777)
1. Differences between observers in blood pressure measurement with an automatic oscillometric recorder.
Bruce NG; Cook DG; Shaper AG
J Hypertens Suppl; 1990 Sep; 8(4):S11-3. PubMed ID: 2258777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor.
Beaubien ER; Card CM; Card SE; Biem HJ; Wilson TW
J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 16(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 12214262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oscillometric blood pressure measurements: differences between measured and calculated mean arterial pressure.
Kiers HD; Hofstra JM; Wetzels JF
Neth J Med; 2008 Dec; 66(11):474-9. PubMed ID: 19075313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurements of blood pressure with various techniques in daily practice: uncertainty in diagnosing office hypertension with short-term in-hospital registration of blood pressure.
Braun HJ; Rabouw H; Werner H; van Montfrans GA; de Stigter C; Zwinderman AH
Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10450115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of pulse pressure on the accuracy of wrist blood pressure measurement.
Westhoff TH; Schmidt S; Meissner R; Zidek W; van der Giet M
J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 23(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 19092843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Quality assurance in Riva-Rocci blood pressure measurement: simultaneous sphygmomanometry with open and covered pressure display].
Hartmann B; Weise H; Bassenge E
Z Kardiol; 1988 Aug; 77(8):537-42. PubMed ID: 3176598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients.
Loubser PG
Med Instrum; 1986; 20(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 3784934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the accuracy of the Omron HEM-907 blood pressure device.
Gurpreet K; Tee GH; Karuthan C
Med J Malaysia; 2008 Aug; 63(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 19248698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Microlife BPA100 Plus device for self-home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Neofytou MS; Adamopoulos DN
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16702824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT).
Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Automatic measurement of arterial pressure].
Boaventura I; Fonseca T; Ramalhinho V; da Costa JN
Rev Port Cardiol; 1993 Feb; 12(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8461153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial.
Heinemann M; Sellick K; Rickard C; Reynolds P; McGrail M
Int J Nurs Pract; 2008 Aug; 14(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18715391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the efficacy of the Omron HEM-737 IntelliSense device for use on adults according to the recommendations of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Anwar YA; Giacco S; McCabe EJ; Tendler BE; White WB
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Aug; 3(4):261-265. PubMed ID: 10212364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
