BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22588400)

  • 1. Value of 3-D CT in classifying acetabular fractures during orthopedic residency training.
    Garrett J; Halvorson J; Carroll E; Webb LX
    Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e615-20. PubMed ID: 22588400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of 3D Printed Models in Resident Education for the Classification of Acetabulum Fractures.
    Lim PK; Stephenson GS; Keown TW; Byrne C; Lin CC; Marecek GS; Scolaro JA
    J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):1679-1684. PubMed ID: 29929817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of a three-dimensional "hands-on" anatomic teaching module on acetabular fracture pattern recognition by orthopaedic residents.
    Hansen E; Marmor M; Matityahu A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):e1771-7. PubMed ID: 23224397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does semi-automatic bone-fragment segmentation improve the reproducibility of the Letournel acetabular fracture classification?
    Boudissa M; Orfeuvre B; Chabanas M; Tonetti J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):633-638. PubMed ID: 28428032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normal acetabular anatomy for acetabular fracture assessment: CT and plain film correlation.
    Saks BJ
    Radiology; 1986 Apr; 159(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 3952299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of acetabular fractures with two- and three-dimensional CT.
    Martinez CR; Di Pasquale TG; Helfet DL; Graham AW; Sanders RW; Ray LD
    Radiographics; 1992 Mar; 12(2):227-42. PubMed ID: 1561413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The value of CT in classification and decision making in acetabulum fractures. A systematic analysis].
    Hüfner T; Pohlemann T; Gänsslen A; Assassi P; Prokop M; Tscherne H
    Unfallchirurg; 1999 Feb; 102(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 10098419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures?
    Brouwers L; Pull Ter Gunne AF; de Jongh MA; Maal TJJ; Vreeken R; van der Heijden FHWM; Leenen LPH; Spanjersberg WR; van Helden SH; Verbeek DO; Bemelman M; Lansink KWW
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 31531739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of an algorithm for classifying acetabular fractures: a role for resident education?
    Ly TV; Stover MD; Sims SH; Reilly MC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Aug; 469(8):2371-6. PubMed ID: 21643925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning Acetabular Fracture Classification using a Three-Dimensional Interactive Software: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Wang H; Lyu F; Sugand K; Wong S; Lin Y; Wang Q
    Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):655-663. PubMed ID: 30411521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acetabular fractures: what radiologists should know and how 3D CT can aid classification.
    Scheinfeld MH; Dym AA; Spektor M; Avery LL; Dym RJ; Amanatullah DF
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(2):555-77. PubMed ID: 25763739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Can the new CT-based classification of acetabular fractures be useful for clinical practice?].
    Chmelová J; Dzupa V; Sprindrich J; Báca V; Grill R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 17623611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acetabular fractures: anatomic and clinical considerations.
    Lawrence DA; Menn K; Baumgaertner M; Haims AH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):W425-36. PubMed ID: 23971473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fractures of the acetabulum: imaging, classification, and understanding.
    Potok PS; Hopper KD; Umlauf MJ
    Radiographics; 1995 Jan; 15(1):7-23; discussion 23-4. PubMed ID: 7899615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can experts in acetabular fracture care determine hip stability after posterior wall fractures using plain radiographs and computed tomography?
    Davis AT; Moed BR
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Oct; 27(10):587-91. PubMed ID: 23287759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Judet view radiographs accuracy in classification of acetabular fractures compared with three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan: a retrospective study.
    Tazeabadi SA; Noroozi SG; Salehzadeh M; Bahardoust M; Farahini H; Hajializade M; Yeganeh A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):405. PubMed ID: 32590966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acetabular fractures revisited: part 2, a new CT-based classification.
    Harris JH; Coupe KJ; Lee JS; Trotscher T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1367-75. PubMed ID: 15149976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT-generated radiographs in obese patients with acetabular fractures: can they be used in lieu of plain radiographs?
    Sinatra PM; Moed BR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Nov; 472(11):3362-9. PubMed ID: 24867453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of articular fragment displacement in acetabular fractures: a comparison of computerized tomography and plain radiographs.
    Borrelli J; Goldfarb C; Catalano L; Evanoff BA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2002 Aug; 16(7):449-56; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 12172273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification of common acetabular fractures: radiographic and CT appearances.
    Durkee NJ; Jacobson J; Jamadar D; Karunakar MA; Morag Y; Hayes C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):915-25. PubMed ID: 16985135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.