These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22588405)

  • 1. Clinical Outcomes After Computer-assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Xie C; Liu K; Xiao L; Tang R
    Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e647-53. PubMed ID: 22588405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.
    Cheng T; Zhang G; Zhang X
    J Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 171(2):590-600. PubMed ID: 21176919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up.
    Cheng T; Pan XY; Mao X; Zhang GY; Zhang XL
    Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 22130355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of blood loss in minimally invasive surgery with and without electromagnetic computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
    Thiengwittayaporn S; Junsee D; Tanavalee A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S27-32. PubMed ID: 20120662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: meta-analysis.
    Teng Y; Du W; Jiang J; Gao X; Pan S; Wang J; An L; Ma J; Xia Y
    Orthopedics; 2012 Dec; 35(12):e1722-31. PubMed ID: 23218628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: a comparison of tourniquet time, blood loss and length of stay.
    Ajwani SH; Jones M; Jarratt JW; Shepard GJ; Ryan WG
    Knee; 2012 Oct; 19(5):606-10. PubMed ID: 22197632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
    Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
    Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
    Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective non-randomized comparative clinical outcome of computer assisted total knee arthroplasty with and without a minimally invasive approach.
    Leelasestaporn C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Sep; 94(9):1089-95. PubMed ID: 21970198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-assisted versus manual TKA: no difference in clinical or functional outcomes at 5-year follow-up.
    Yaffe M; Chan P; Goyal N; Luo M; Cayo M; Stulberg SD
    Orthopedics; 2013 May; 36(5):e627-32. PubMed ID: 23672916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial.
    Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 May; 27(5):667-72.e1. PubMed ID: 21958937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty provides superior short term functional outcomes: a meta-analysis.
    Rebal BA; Babatunde OM; Lee JH; Geller JA; Patrick DA; Macaulay W
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):938-44. PubMed ID: 24140274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the outcome of computer-assisted total knee replacement.
    Decking R; Markmann Y; Mattes T; Puhl W; Scharf HP
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17623604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty to preserve quadriceps strength: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kim JG; Lee SW; Ha JK; Choi HJ; Yang SJ; Lee MY
    Knee; 2011 Dec; 18(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 20833549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis.
    Gandhi R; Tsvetkov D; Davey JR; Mahomed NN
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jul; 91(7):889-95. PubMed ID: 19567852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial.
    Seon JK; Song EK
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 16950026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty].
    Shi MG; Lü HS; Guan ZP
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 44(16):1101-5. PubMed ID: 17081464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mobile bearing UKA compared to fixed bearing TKA: a randomized prospective study.
    Sun PF; Jia YH
    Knee; 2012 Mar; 19(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 21345681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement. Preliminary results: report of 60 cases].
    El Masri F; Rammal H; Ghanem I; El Hage S; El Abiad R; Kharrat K; Dagher F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18456061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic review of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.
    Zamora LA; Humphreys KJ; Watt AM; Forel D; Cameron AL
    ANZ J Surg; 2013 Jan; 83(1-2):22-30. PubMed ID: 22984894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.