428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22592143)
21. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice.
Zareba P; Zhang J; Yilmaz A; Trpkov K
Histopathology; 2009 Oct; 55(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 19817888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Underestimation of Gleason score at prostate biopsy reflects sampling error in lower volume tumours.
Corcoran NM; Hovens CM; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Casey RG; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Goldenberg SL; Costello AJ
BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 21895937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Long-term prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: impact on prostate cancer specific survival.
Tollefson MK; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Zincke H; Blute ML
J Urol; 2006 Feb; 175(2):547-51. PubMed ID: 16406993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A pathological reassessment of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 prostatic adenocarcinomas that progress after radical prostatectomy.
Miyamoto H; Hernandez DJ; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2009 Dec; 40(12):1693-8. PubMed ID: 19683331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prognostic significance of global grading system of Gleason score in patients with prostate cancer with bone metastasis.
Kambara T; Oyama T; Segawa A; Fukabori Y; Yoshida K
BJU Int; 2010 Jun; 105(11):1519-25. PubMed ID: 19912185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomy.
Amin A; Partin A; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1286-90. PubMed ID: 21862072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4.
Lau WK; Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Weaver AL; Sebo TJ; Zincke H
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1692-7. PubMed ID: 11586204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Gleason inflation 1998-2011: a registry study of 97,168 men.
Danneman D; Drevin L; Robinson D; Stattin P; Egevad L
BJU Int; 2015 Feb; 115(2):248-55. PubMed ID: 24552193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer?
van Oort IM; Schout BM; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen CA; Witjes JA
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 16046051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
