These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22592323)

  • 1. Workplace-based assessment: raters' performance theories and constructs.
    Govaerts MJ; Van de Wiel MW; Schuwirth LW; Van der Vleuten CP; Muijtjens AM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Aug; 18(3):375-96. PubMed ID: 22592323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Workplace-based assessment: effects of rater expertise.
    Govaerts MJ; Schuwirth LW; Van der Vleuten CP; Muijtjens AM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 May; 16(2):151-65. PubMed ID: 20882335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implicit versus explicit first impressions in performance-based assessment: will raters overcome their first impressions when learner performance changes?
    Wood TJ; Daniels VJ; Pugh D; Touchie C; Halman S; Humphrey-Murto S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Sep; 29(4):1155-1168. PubMed ID: 38010576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An exploration of "real time" assessments as a means to better understand preceptors' judgments of student performance.
    Luu K; Sidhu R; Chadha NK; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 Aug; 28(3):793-809. PubMed ID: 36441287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expectations, observations, and the cognitive processes that bind them: expert assessment of examinee performance.
    St-Onge C; Chamberland M; Lévesque A; Varpio L
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Aug; 21(3):627-42. PubMed ID: 26620923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters' divergent points of view.
    Gingerich A; Ramlo SE; van der Vleuten CPM; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):819-838. PubMed ID: 27651046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors Influencing Mini-CEX Rater Judgments and Their Practical Implications: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Lee V; Brain K; Martin J
    Acad Med; 2017 Jun; 92(6):880-887. PubMed ID: 28030422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Reliable are Single-Question Workplace-Based Assessments in Surgery?
    Gates RS; Krumm AE; Cate OT; Chen X; Marcotte K; Thelen AE; Deal SB; Alseidi A; Swanson D; George BC
    J Surg Educ; 2024 Jul; 81(7):967-972. PubMed ID: 38816336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selecting and Simplifying: Rater Performance and Behavior When Considering Multiple Competencies.
    Tavares W; Ginsburg S; Eva KW
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 26787084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of a rater training on rating accuracy in a physical examination skills assessment.
    Weitz G; Vinzentius C; Twesten C; Lehnert H; Bonnemeier H; König IR
    GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2014; 31(4):Doc41. PubMed ID: 25489341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do entrustment scales make a difference in the inter-rater reliability of the workplace-based assessment?
    Eltayar AN; Aref SR; Khalifa HM; Hammad AS
    Med Educ Online; 2022 Dec; 27(1):2053401. PubMed ID: 35311494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. More consensus than idiosyncrasy: Categorizing social judgments to examine variability in Mini-CEX ratings.
    Gingerich A; van der Vleuten CP; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Acad Med; 2014 Nov; 89(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 25250753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rater cognition: review and integration of research findings.
    Gauthier G; St-Onge C; Tavares W
    Med Educ; 2016 May; 50(5):511-22. PubMed ID: 27072440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using frame-of-reference training to understand the implications of rater idiosyncrasy for rating accuracy.
    Uggerslev KL; Sulsky LM
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 May; 93(3):711-9. PubMed ID: 18457499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emotions and assessment: considerations for rater-based judgements of entrustment.
    Gomez-Garibello C; Young M
    Med Educ; 2018 Mar; 52(3):254-262. PubMed ID: 29119582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Entrustability Scales: Outlining Their Usefulness for Competency-Based Clinical Assessment.
    Rekman J; Gofton W; Dudek N; Gofton T; Hamstra SJ
    Acad Med; 2016 Feb; 91(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 26630609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the role of first impressions in rater-based assessments.
    Wood TJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Aug; 19(3):409-27. PubMed ID: 23529821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the impact of mental workload on rater-based assessments.
    Tavares W; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 May; 18(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 22484964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of first impressions on subsequent ratings within an OSCE station.
    Wood TJ; Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh D; Touchie C
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):969-983. PubMed ID: 27848171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How faculty members experience workplace-based assessment rater training: a qualitative study.
    Kogan JR; Conforti LN; Bernabeo E; Iobst W; Holmboe E
    Med Educ; 2015 Jul; 49(7):692-708. PubMed ID: 26077217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.