137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22593813)
1. The OnControl bone marrow biopsy technique is superior to the standard manual technique for hematologists-in-training: a prospective, randomized comparison.
Reed LJ; Raghupathy R; Strakhan M; Philbeck TE; Kim MY; Battini R; Hussain Z; Abdullah S; Schweber S; Bala K; Pacello T
Hematol Rep; 2011 Oct; 3(3):e21. PubMed ID: 22593813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the bone marrow trephine sample quality between OnControl drill system and the Jamshidi needle.
Forwood KM; Lee E; Crispin PJ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Jun; 41(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 30779423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomised study of a rotary powered device (OnControl) for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.
Swords RT; Anguita J; Higgins RA; Yunes AC; Naski M; Padmanabhan S; Kelly KR; Mahalingam D; Philbeck T; Miller L; Puga TA; Giles FJ; Kinney MC; Brenner AJ
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):809-13. PubMed ID: 21606230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adequacy of powered vs manual bone marrow biopsy specimens: a retrospective review of sequential marrow aspirates and biopsies in 68 patients.
Lynch DW; Stauffer SL; Rosenthal NS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 143(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 25780005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a powered bone marrow biopsy device with a manual system: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Bucher CM; Lehmann T; Tichelli A; Tzankov A; Dirnhofer S; Passweg J; Rovó A
J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 23105124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone marrow biopsies performed by both the powered OnControl drill device and the Jamshidi needle produce adequate specimens.
Jain S; Enzerra M; Mehta RS; Smith R; Djokic M
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Jun; 70(6):541-543. PubMed ID: 28062659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using a powered bone marrow biopsy system results in shorter procedures, causes less residual pain to adult patients, and yields larger specimens.
Berenson JR; Yellin O; Blumenstein B; Bojanower D; Croopnick J; Aboulafia D; Upadhyaya G; Spadaccini C
Diagn Pathol; 2011 Mar; 6():23. PubMed ID: 21429220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rotary powered device for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy yields excellent specimens quickly and efficiently.
Swords RT; Kelly KR; Cohen SC; Miller LJ; Philbeck TE; Hacker SO; Spadaccini CJ; Giles FJ; Brenner AJ
J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):562-5. PubMed ID: 20404008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices.
Miller LJ; Philbeck TE; Montez DF; Puga TA; Brodie KE; Cohen SC; Spadaccini C; Swords R; Brenner AJ
Hematol Rep; 2011 Jan; 3(1):e8. PubMed ID: 22184530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT guided bone biopsy using a battery powered intraosseous device.
Schnapauff D; Marnitz T; Freyhardt P; Collettini F; Hartwig K; Jöhrens K; Hamm B; Kroencke T; Gebauer B
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2013 Oct; 36(5):1405-10. PubMed ID: 23580120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of bone marrow trephine sample quality between a drill-powered system and a manual needle system.
Mihailescu SD; Jaselme P; Fontoura ML; Feddag-Hannachi L; Veresezan EL; Drieux F; Camus V; Bouclet F; Tilly H; Cardinaël N; Jardin F
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Aug; 59():151952. PubMed ID: 35468352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of Radiation Dose and Scanning Time While Preserving Diagnostic Yield: A Comparison of Battery-Powered and Manual Bone Biopsy Systems.
Kihira S; Koo C; Lee A; Aggarwal A; Pawha P; Doshi A
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Mar; 41(3):387-392. PubMed ID: 32029464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Bone Marrow Biopsy Specimens Obtained Using a Motorized Device and Manual Biopsy Systems.
Glennon CA; Woodroof JM; Kambhampati S; Battershell AC; O'Connor SR; Roberts KB
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs; 2018; 5(4):394-398. PubMed ID: 30271822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Battery-Powered and Manual Bone Biopsy Systems for Core Needle Biopsy of Sclerotic Bone Lesions.
Cohen MG; McMahon CJ; Kung JW; Wu JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):W83-6. PubMed ID: 26959290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel pneumatic drill for bone biopsy under MRI imaging.
Fischer E; Gebremeskel M; Stoianovici D; Sharma K; Cleary K
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2024 Mar; 19(3):405-409. PubMed ID: 38148438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Targeting the anterior superior iliac spine yields significantly longer bone marrow cores.
Reed L; Attarian S; Pendurti G; Singh AP; Budhathoki A; Abi-Aad S; Shah UA; Kim S; Bachiashvili K; Moon JY; Kim M; Elrafei T; Alexis K; Strakhan M; Li W; Friedman E
J Clin Pathol; 2018 Feb; 71(2):172-173. PubMed ID: 28844037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone marrow solid core biopsy needle: a critical assessment of the utility, benefits and limitations of the instruments employed in current day haematology and oncology.
Islam A
J Clin Pathol; 2018 Jun; 71(6):475-482. PubMed ID: 29217729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and safety of bone marrow aspiration and biopsy using fluoroscopic guidance and a drill-powered needle: clinical experience from 775 cases.
Long JR; Stensby JD; Wiesner EL; Bryson WN; Hillen TJ; Jennings JW
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5964-5970. PubMed ID: 32518988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of powered drill & manual bone biopsy systems: Does the diagnostic yield justify the cost?
Huh EH; Yi PH; Ray DM; Hsu LCH; Hui FK; Khan M
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 73():125-129. PubMed ID: 31992515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT-guided bone biopsy with a battery-powered drill system: preliminary results.
Lee RK; Ng AW; Griffith JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1093-5. PubMed ID: 24147481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
