130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22594492)
1. Can the government ban organ sale? Recent court challenges and the future of US law on selling human organs and other tissue.
Cohen IG
Am J Transplant; 2012 Aug; 12(8):1983-7. PubMed ID: 22594492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selling bone marrow--Flynn v. Holder.
Cohen IG
N Engl J Med; 2012 Jan; 366(4):296-7. PubMed ID: 22187961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ninth Circuit rules donors may receive compensation for blood-based bone marrow transplant donations--Flynn v. Holder.
Taberner M
Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(1):233-6. PubMed ID: 22497100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Supreme Court refuses to review clinic access law; Second Appeals Court upholds statute.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Jun; 4(13):2-3. PubMed ID: 12346292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
Denniston L
Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commodification arguments for the legal prohibition of organ sale.
Wilkinson S
Health Care Anal; 2000; 8(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 11183446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court issues limited ruling in challenge to Utah abortion ban.
Reprod Freedom News; 1996 Jun; 5(11):2. PubMed ID: 12291525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. States' Rights, Gun Violence Litigation, and Tort Immunity.
Higgins HJ; Lowy JE; Rising AJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2020 Dec; 48(4_suppl):83-89. PubMed ID: 33404317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2001: vagueness and federalism.
Swartz JS
Jurimetrics; 2002; 43(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 15233124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anti-choice group seeks Supreme Court review of federal clinic access law; Congress holds hearings.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 May; 4(10):2. PubMed ID: 12346170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. To solve a deadly shortage: economic incentives for human organ donation.
Harris CE; Alcorn SP
Issues Law Med; 2001; 16(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 11285861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supreme Court rejects challenge to FACE.
Reprod Freedom News; 1996 Oct; 5(17):2. PubMed ID: 12320456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Organ allocation and the states: can the states restrict broader organ sharing?
Chen RT
Duke Law J; 1999 Oct; 49(1):261-296. PubMed ID: 10915437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Appeals court finds Utah late abortion restrictions unconstitutional.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Sep; 4(16):2. PubMed ID: 12320245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benten v. Kessler: the RU 486 import case.
Pine RN
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 1434768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reframing federalism--the Affordable Care Act (and broccoli) in the Supreme Court.
Mariner WK; Glantz LH; Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2012 Sep; 367(12):1154-8. PubMed ID: 22809363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Nepalis question the law against selling human organs.
Khanal P
Bull World Health Organ; 2003; 81(7):547-8. PubMed ID: 12973649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Organs for sale.
Sun M
Science; 1983 Oct; 222(4619):34. PubMed ID: 11644052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Just saying no to NOTA: court permits the sale of hematopoietic stem cells.
Steinbuch R
J Natl Med Assoc; 2012; 104(3-4):219-20. PubMed ID: 22774392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
