These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22595091)

  • 1. Data mining of audiology patient records: factors influencing the choice of hearing aid type.
    Anwar MN; Oakes MP
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Apr; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. PubMed ID: 22595091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mining and analysis of audiology data to find significant factors associated with tinnitus masker.
    Anwar MN
    Springerplus; 2013; 2():595. PubMed ID: 24255873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some factors influencing choice of type of hearing aid in the UK: behind-the-ear or in-the-ear.
    Brooks DN
    Br J Audiol; 1994 Apr; 28(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7841893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting the use and perceived benefit of ITE and BTE hearing aids.
    Baumfield A; Dillon H
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Aug; 35(4):247-58. PubMed ID: 11694099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experienced hearing aid users' perspectives of assessment and communication within audiology: a qualitative study using digital methods.
    Parmar BJ; Mehta K; Vickers DA; Bizley JK
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Nov; 61(11):956-964. PubMed ID: 34821527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
    Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the bystander-effect of 2.5G mobile telephones on the speech perception of digital hearing aid users.
    Vlastarakos PV; Nikolopoulos TP; Manolopoulos L; Stamou A; Halkiotis KK; Ferekidis E; Georgiou E
    B-ENT; 2012; 8(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 22896928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effectiveness of partial and complete instrumental masking in chronic tinnitus. Studies with reference to retraining therapy].
    von Wedel H; von Wedel UC; Streppel M; Walger M
    HNO; 1997 Sep; 45(9):690-4. PubMed ID: 9417450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of microphone location in ITE versus BTE hearing aids.
    Gartrell EL; Church GT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jul; 1(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 2132598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of the transtheoretical model of behaviour change for identifying older clients' readiness for hearing rehabilitation during history-taking in audiology appointments.
    Ekberg K; Grenness C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S42-51. PubMed ID: 27420546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of client and clinician views of the importance of factors in client-clinician interaction in hearing aid purchase decisions.
    Poost-Foroosh L; Jennings MB; Cheesman MF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 25751693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The "hearing aid effect" 2005: a rigorous test of the visibility of new hearing aid styles.
    Johnson CE; Danhauer JL; Gavin RB; Karns SR; Reith AC; Lopez IP
    Am J Audiol; 2005 Dec; 14(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 16489875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of compression and hearing aid style on directional hearing aid benefit and performance.
    Ricketts T; Lindley G; Henry P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):348-61. PubMed ID: 11527041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal hearing aid use: focus groups with hearing aid clients and audiologists.
    Laplante-Lévesque A; Jensen LD; Dawes P; Nielsen C
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 23183046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Referral rates of postlingually deafened adult hearing aid users for a cochlear implant candidacy assessment.
    Looi V; Bluett C; Boisvert I
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):919-925. PubMed ID: 28678547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient preferences for direct hearing aid provision by a private dispenser. A discrete choice experiment.
    Grutters JP; Joore MA; Kessels AG; Davis AC; Anteunis LJ
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):557-64. PubMed ID: 18469716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The advantages and disadvantages of ITC, ITE and BTE hearing aids: diary and interview reports from elderly users.
    May AE; Upfold LJ; Battaglia JA
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Oct; 24(5):301-9. PubMed ID: 2265300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments.
    Pumford JM; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Jenstad LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 10741354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modifications of the MUlti stimulus test with Hidden Reference and Anchor (MUSHRA) for use in audiology.
    Völker C; Bisitz T; Huber R; Kollmeier B; Ernst SMA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S92-S104. PubMed ID: 27598985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.