These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22595156)
1. Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study. Hausleiter J; Meyer TS; Martuscelli E; Spagnolo P; Yamamoto H; Carrascosa P; Anger T; Lehmkuhl L; Alkadhi H; Martinoff S; Hadamitzky M; Hein F; Bischoff B; Kuse M; Schömig A; Achenbach S JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 May; 5(5):484-93. PubMed ID: 22595156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality and radiation dose of a prospectively electrocardiography-triggered high-pitch data acquisition strategy for coronary CT angiography: The multicenter, randomized PROTECTION IV study. Deseive S; Pugliese F; Meave A; Alexanderson E; Martinoff S; Hadamitzky M; Massberg S; Hausleiter J J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 25926015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial. Hausleiter J; Martinoff S; Hadamitzky M; Martuscelli E; Pschierer I; Feuchtner GM; Catalán-Sanz P; Czermak B; Meyer TS; Hein F; Bischoff B; Kuse M; Schömig A; Achenbach S JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Nov; 3(11):1113-23. PubMed ID: 21070998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of sequential and helical scanning for radiation dose and image quality: results of the Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography (PROTECTION) I Study. Bischoff B; Hein F; Meyer T; Krebs M; Hadamitzky M; Martinoff S; Schömig A; Hausleiter J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1495-9. PubMed ID: 20489088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coronary computed tomography angiography during arrhythmia: Radiation dose reduction with prospectively ECG-triggered axial and retrospectively ECG-gated helical 128-slice dual-source CT. Lee AM; Engel LC; Shah B; Liew G; Sidhu MS; Kalra M; Abbara S; Brady TJ; Hoffmann U; Ghoshhajra BB J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(3):172-183.e2. PubMed ID: 22542280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source CT at 70 kVp tube voltage: feasibility, image quality, radiation dose, and effect of iterative reconstruction. Hell MM; Bittner D; Schuhbaeck A; Muschiol G; Brand M; Lell M; Uder M; Achenbach S; Marwan M J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(6):418-25. PubMed ID: 25439789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety and accuracy of dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography in the pediatric population. Han BK; Lindberg J; Overman D; Schwartz RS; Grant K; Lesser JR J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(4):252-9. PubMed ID: 22732198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual-source coronary CT angiography in patients with high heart rates using a prospectively ECG-triggered axial mode at end-systole. Kim HY; Lee JW; Hong YJ; Lee HJ; Hur J; Nam JE; Choi BW; Kim YJ Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Dec; 28 Suppl 2():101-7. PubMed ID: 23099512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study. Neefjes LA; Dharampal AS; Rossi A; Nieman K; Weustink AC; Dijkshoorn ML; Ten Kate GJ; Dedic A; Papadopoulou SL; van Straten M; Cademartiri F; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ; Mollet NR Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):779-86. PubMed ID: 21969666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thoracic aorta: prospective electrocardiographically triggered CT angiography with dual-source CT--feasibility, image quality, and dose reduction. Blanke P; Bulla S; Baumann T; Siepe M; Winterer JT; Euringer W; Schäfer AO; Kotter E; Langer M; Pache G Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):207-17. PubMed ID: 20160003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. Maruyama T; Takada M; Hasuike T; Yoshikawa A; Namimatsu E; Yoshizumi T J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Oct; 52(18):1450-5. PubMed ID: 19017511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. Achenbach S; Goroll T; Seltmann M; Pflederer T; Anders K; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Uder M; Lell M; Marwan M JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Apr; 4(4):328-37. PubMed ID: 21492807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols. Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-concentration contrast medium for 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography at a very low radiation dose using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Zheng M; Wu Y; Wei M; Liu Y; Zhao H; Li J Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 25457735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation dose of coronary CT angiography with a third-generation dual-source CT in a "real-world" patient population. Kosmala A; Petritsch B; Weng AM; Bley TA; Gassenmaier T Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):4341-4348. PubMed ID: 30506216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-dose adaptive sequential scan for dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rate: comparison with retrospective ECG gating. Xu L; Yang L; Zhang Z; Li Y; Fan Z; Ma X; Lv B; Yu W Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 76(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 19595528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-dose dual-source CT angiography with iterative reconstruction for coronary artery stent evaluation. Eisentopf J; Achenbach S; Ulzheimer S; Layritz C; Wuest W; May M; Lell M; Ropers D; Klinghammer L; Daniel WG; Pflederer T JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Apr; 6(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 23498678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of low-dose prospectively gated axial coronary CT angiography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable heart rate. Carrascosa P; Capuñay C; Deviggiano A; Goldsmit A; Tajer C; Bettinotti M; Carrascosa J; Ivanc TB; Fallahi A; García MJ J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 20444666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary CT angiography with single-source and dual-source CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose between prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated protocols. Sabarudin A; Sun Z; Yusof AK Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):746-53. PubMed ID: 23098849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality and radiation dose comparison of prospectively triggered low-dose CCTA: 128-slice dual-source high-pitch spiral versus 64-slice single-source sequential acquisition. Ghadri JR; Küest SM; Goetti R; Fiechter M; Pazhenkottil AP; Nkoulou RN; Kuhn FP; Pietsch C; von Schulthess P; Gaemperli O; Templin C; Kaufmann PA Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28(5):1217-25. PubMed ID: 21744246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]