These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22595743)

  • 1. Male and female faces are only perceived categorically when linked to familiar identities--and when in doubt, he is a male.
    Armann R; Bülthoff I
    Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 63():69-80. PubMed ID: 22595743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Personally familiar faces are perceived categorically in face-selective regions other than the fusiform face area.
    Ramon M; Dricot L; Rossion B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 32(9):1587-98. PubMed ID: 20880360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probing the face-space of individuals with prosopagnosia.
    Nishimura M; Doyle J; Humphreys K; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1828-41. PubMed ID: 20227431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex differences in face gender recognition in humans.
    Cellerino A; Borghetti D; Sartucci F
    Brain Res Bull; 2004 Jul; 63(6):443-9. PubMed ID: 15249109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Face familiarity, distinctiveness, and categorical perception.
    Angeli A; Davidoff J; Valentine T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):690-707. PubMed ID: 17853232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detailed exploration of face-related processing in congenital prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral findings.
    Behrmann M; Avidan G; Marotta JJ; Kimchi R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Jul; 17(7):1130-49. PubMed ID: 16102241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender-based prototype formation in face recognition.
    Baudouin JY; Brochard R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):888-98. PubMed ID: 21480752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex.
    Mazard A; Schiltz C; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):912-22. PubMed ID: 16229867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid extraction of mean identity from sets of faces.
    de Fockert J; Wolfenstein C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1716-22. PubMed ID: 19382009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acquired prosopagnosia as a face-specific disorder: ruling out the general visual similarity account.
    Busigny T; Graf M; Mayer E; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2051-67. PubMed ID: 20362595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual learning in face processing: comparison facilitates face recognition.
    Dwyer DM; Vladeanu M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2055-67. PubMed ID: 19235097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The brain response to personally familiar faces in autism: findings of fusiform activity and beyond.
    Pierce K; Haist F; Sedaghat F; Courchesne E
    Brain; 2004 Dec; 127(Pt 12):2703-16. PubMed ID: 15319275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The nature of synthetic face adaptation.
    Anderson ND; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1815-28. PubMed ID: 15797771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identity processing in multiple-face tracking.
    Ren D; Chen W; Liu CH; Fu X
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):18.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critical frequencies in the perception of letters, faces, and novel shapes: evidence for limited scale invariance for faces.
    Oruç I; Barton JJ
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):20. PubMed ID: 21047752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Categorical perception for unfamiliar faces. The effect of covert and overt face learning.
    Kikutani M; Roberson D; Hanley JR
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jun; 21(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 20483817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Holistic perception of the individual face is specific and necessary: evidence from an extensive case study of acquired prosopagnosia.
    Busigny T; Joubert S; Felician O; Ceccaldi M; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):4057-92. PubMed ID: 20875437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.