These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22596108)

  • 21. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies.
    Niemeier M; Stojanoski B; Singh VW; Chu E
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 18243459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial bias and right hemisphere function: sex-specific changes with aging.
    Chen P; Goedert KM; Murray E; Kelly K; Ahmeti S; Barrett AM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2011 May; 17(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 21320378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatial biases in viewing behavior.
    Ossandón JP; Onat S; König P
    J Vis; 2014 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 24569986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Setting the midpoint of sentences: The role of the left hemisphere.
    Veronelli L; Arduino LS; Biscaro V; Corbo M; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107287. PubMed ID: 31863803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatial bias induced by a non-conflictual task reveals the nature of space perception.
    Dupierrix E; Alleysson D; Ohlmann T; Chokron S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1214():127-35. PubMed ID: 18462710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ineffective leftward search in line bisection and mechanisms of left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Seki K; Koyama Y; Gono S
    J Neurol; 1996 May; 243(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 8741077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual size processing in spatial neglect.
    Milner AD; Harvey M; Pritchard CL
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Nov; 123(1-2):192-200. PubMed ID: 9835409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. "Mind the gap": the size-distance dissociation in visual neglect is a cueing effect.
    McIntosh RD; McClements KI; Dijkerman HC; Milner AD
    Cortex; 2004 Apr; 40(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 15156792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect.
    Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(7):1073-86. PubMed ID: 10775717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.
    Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
    Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peripersonal spatial attention in children with spina bifida: associations between horizontal and vertical line bisection and congenital malformations of the corpus callosum, midbrain, and posterior cortex.
    Dennis M; Edelstein K; Frederick J; Copeland K; Francis D; Blaser SE; Kramer LA; Drake JM; Brandt M; Hetherington R; Fletcher JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2000-10. PubMed ID: 15893777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Monocular patching affects inattention but not perseveration in spatial neglect.
    Khurshid S; Longin H; Crucian GP; Barrett AM
    Neurocase; 2009 Aug; 15(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 19370480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention.
    Roth HL; Lora AN; Heilman KM
    Brain; 2002 Sep; 125(Pt 9):2023-35. PubMed ID: 12183348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.
    Orr CA; Nicholls ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(3):384-93. PubMed ID: 15827740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion?
    Dolores de Hevia M; Girelli L; Vallar G
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):254-64. PubMed ID: 16044296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Age-related changes in the allocation of spatially directed focal attention.
    Mańkowska A; Heilman KM; Williamson JB; Michałowski J; Harciarek M
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2020 Sep; 27(5):748-764. PubMed ID: 31610738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.