These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2259659)

  • 1. Decreased pain with lower flexural rigidity of uncemented femoral prostheses.
    Skinner HB; Curlin FJ
    Orthopedics; 1990 Nov; 13(11):1223-8. PubMed ID: 2259659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence of thigh pain after uncemented total hip arthroplasty as a function of femoral stem size.
    Vresilovic EJ; Hozack WJ; Rothman RH
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Apr; 11(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 8713911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with AML, PCA and HGP prostheses.
    Hwang SK; Park JS
    Int Orthop; 1995; 19(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 7649688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical results of the midstem porous-coated anatomic uncemented femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty: a five- to nine-year prospective study.
    Knight JL; Atwater RD; Guo J
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Aug; 13(5):535-45. PubMed ID: 9726319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A comparative study on short-term effectiveness between cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of femoral head after renal transplantation].
    Yu L; Qi C; Yu T; Meng Q; Zhao X; Liu K; Cai Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(12):1409-13. PubMed ID: 24640354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct comparison between bilaterally implanted cemented and uncemented total hip replacements in six patients.
    Ritter MA; Campbell ED
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Jun; (207):77-82. PubMed ID: 3720106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Five-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of the uncemented long-term stable fixation total hip arthroplasty.
    Sharkey PF; Barrack RL; Tvedten DE
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Aug; 13(5):546-51. PubMed ID: 9726320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study.
    Amstutz HC; Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 14711942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 21-year results of the uncemented fully textured lord hip prosthesis.
    Martínez de Aragón JS; Keisu KS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jan; 454():133-8. PubMed ID: 16906119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The porous-coated anatomic (PCA) total hip arthroplasty: a review of 73 uncemented cases with 2-year follow up.
    Billotti J; Zimmerman MC; Pizzurro J; Mango T; Billings J; Parsons JR
    Orthopedics; 1995 Jan; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7899167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High wear rates and extensive osteolysis in 3 types of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a review of the PCA, the Harris Galante and the Profile/Tri-Lock Plus arthroplasties with a minimum of 12 years median follow-up in 96 hips.
    Hallan G; Lie SA; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):575-84. PubMed ID: 16929433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the learning curve associated with uncemented primary porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty.
    Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Savory CG; Dysart SH; Hopkinson WJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Sep; (282):132-44. PubMed ID: 1516304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interest of short implants in hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: comparative study "uncemented short" vs "cemented conventional" femoral stems.
    Miladi M; Villain B; Mebtouche N; Bégué T; Aurégan JC
    Int Orthop; 2018 Jul; 42(7):1669-1674. PubMed ID: 29761221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty. Surgical Technique.
    Amstutz HC; Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 2():234-49. PubMed ID: 16951096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Prospective analysis of the tri-lock femoral component.
    Smith SE; Garvin KL; Jardon OM; Kaplan PA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Aug; (269):43-50. PubMed ID: 1864055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review of 10-year results of PCA hip arthroplasty.
    Hastings DE; Tobin H; Sellenkowitsch M
    Can J Surg; 1998 Feb; 41(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 9492747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a hybrid with an uncemented total hip replacement. A retrospective matched-pair study.
    Maloney WJ; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1990 Oct; 72(9):1349-52. PubMed ID: 2229111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cemented collarless (Exeter-CPT) versus cementless collarless (PCA) femoral components. A 2- to 14-year follow-up evaluation.
    Weidenhielm LR; Mikhail WE; Nelissen RG; Bauer TW
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Oct; 10(5):592-7. PubMed ID: 9273368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total hip replacement with cemented, uncemented, and hybrid prostheses. A comparison of clinical and radiographic results at two to four years.
    Wixson RL; Stulberg SD; Mehlhoff M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1991 Feb; 73(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 1899667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultralok uncemented femoral prostheses: 12 to 15 year follow-up evaluation.
    Grant P; Grøgaard B; Nordsletten L
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Apr; 19(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 15067637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.