172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22605566)
1. Postmortem examination of human fetal hearts at or below 20 weeks' gestation: a comparison of high-field MRI at 9.4 T with lower-field MRI magnets and stereomicroscopic autopsy.
Votino C; Jani J; Verhoye M; Bessieres B; Fierens Y; Segers V; Vorsselmans A; Kang X; Cos T; Foulon W; De Mey J; Cannie M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 40(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 22605566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal organ weight estimation by postmortem high-field magnetic resonance imaging before 20 weeks' gestation.
Votino C; Verhoye M; Segers V; Cannie M; Bessieres B; Cos T; Lipombi D; Jani J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 39(6):673-8. PubMed ID: 22407748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Virtual autopsy by computed tomographic angiography of the fetal heart: a feasibility study.
Votino C; Cannie M; Segers V; Dobrescu O; Dessy H; Gallo V; Cos T; Damry N; Jani J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 39(6):679-84. PubMed ID: 22407734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging in the normal fetal heart and in congenital heart disease.
Votino C; Jani J; Damry N; Dessy H; Kang X; Cos T; Divano L; Foulon W; De Mey J; Cannie M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21837757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic quality of 3Tesla postmortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with and without congenital heart disease.
Ulm B; Dovjak GO; Scharrer A; Muin DA; Zimpfer D; Prayer D; Weber M; Berger-Kulemann V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):189.e1-189.e30. PubMed ID: 33662361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential clinical benefits and limitations of fetal virtopsy using high-field MRI at 7 Tesla versus stereomicroscopic autopsy to assess first trimester fetuses.
Staicu A; Albu C; Popa-Stanila R; Chiriac L; Boitor-Borza D; Bondor C; Kovacs T; Caracostea G; Rotar IC; Turcu RVF; Simon S; Muresan D; Stamatian F
Prenat Diagn; 2019 Jun; 39(7):505-518. PubMed ID: 30980413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy.
Thayyil S; Cleary JO; Sebire NJ; Scott RJ; Chong K; Gunny R; Owens CM; Olsen OE; Offiah AC; Parks HG; Chitty LS; Price AN; Yousry TA; Robertson NJ; Lythgoe MF; Taylor AM
Lancet; 2009 Aug; 374(9688):467-75. PubMed ID: 19665645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Post-mortem high-field magnetic resonance imaging: effect or various factors.
Verhoye M; Votino C; Cannie MM; Segers V; Mabiglia C; Cos T; Lipombi D; Jani JC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jul; 26(11):1060-5. PubMed ID: 23339743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postmortem examination of human fetuses: comparison of two-dimensional ultrasound with invasive autopsy.
Kang X; Shelmerdine SC; Hurtado I; Bevilacqua E; Hutchinson C; Mandalia U; Segers V; Cos Sanchez T; Cannie MM; Carlin A; Sebire NJ; Arthurs OJ; Jani JC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 53(2):229-238. PubMed ID: 28782198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study.
Cannie M; Votino C; Moerman P; Vanheste R; Segers V; Van Berkel K; Hanssens M; Kang X; Cos T; Kir M; Balepa L; Divano L; Foulon W; De Mey J; Jani J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 39(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 21919100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postmortem fetal organ volumetry using magnetic resonance imaging and comparison to organ weights at conventional autopsy.
Breeze AC; Gallagher FA; Lomas DJ; Smith GC; Lees CC;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 31(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 18092338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of MRI of the fetal heart with balanced steady-state free precession sequence along fetal body and cardiac planes.
Saleem SN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 191(4):1208-15. PubMed ID: 18806167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conventional vs virtual autopsy with postmortem MRI in phenotypic characterization of stillbirths and fetal malformations.
Shruthi M; Gupta N; Jana M; Mridha AR; Kumar A; Agarwal R; Sharma R; Deka D; Gupta AK; Kabra M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):236-245. PubMed ID: 28295775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A morphometric study of the human fetal heart on post-mortem 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
Sandaite I; De Catte L; Moerman P; Gewillig M; Fedele L; Deprest J; Claus F
Prenat Diagn; 2013 Apr; 33(4):318-27. PubMed ID: 23457008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal postmortem imaging: an overview of current techniques and future perspectives.
Kang X; Carlin A; Cannie MM; Sanchez TC; Jani JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 223(4):493-515. PubMed ID: 32376319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy.
Kang X; Cannie MM; Arthurs OJ; Segers V; Fourneau C; Bevilacqua E; Cos Sanchez T; Sebire NJ; Jani JC
Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3542-3553. PubMed ID: 28116518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical utility of postmortem microcomputed tomography of the fetal heart: diagnostic imaging vs macroscopic dissection.
Hutchinson JC; Arthurs OJ; Ashworth MT; Ramsey AT; Mifsud W; Lombardi CM; Sebire NJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 47(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 26415141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Post-mortem stereomicroscopic examination of embryonic and fetal hearts in the 1st trimester of pregnancy].
Niszczota C; Koleśnik A; Szymkiewicz-Dangel J
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Mar; 81(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 20486541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structural congenital brain disease in congenital heart disease: results from a fetal MRI program.
Mlczoch E; Brugger P; Ulm B; Novak A; Frantal S; Prayer D; Salzer-Muhar U
Eur J Paediatr Neurol; 2013 Mar; 17(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 22944287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postmortem fetal imaging: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging.
Kang X; Sanchez TC; Arthurs OJ; Bevilacqua E; Cannie MM; Segers V; Lecomte S; Sebire NJ; Jani JC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):791-799. PubMed ID: 30644623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
