BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22607172)

  • 1. System-based factors influencing intraoperative decision-making in rectal cancer by surgeons: an international assessment.
    Augestad KM; Lindsetmo RO; Stulberg JJ; Reynolds H; Champagne B; Senagore AJ; Delaney CP;
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):e679-88. PubMed ID: 22607172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of rectal cancer surgery and its relationship to surgeon and hospital caseload: a population-based study.
    Comber H; Sharp L; Timmons A; Keane FB
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):e692-700. PubMed ID: 22731759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The myth of informed consent in rectal cancer surgery: what do patients retain?
    Scheer AS; O'Connor AM; Chan BP; Moloo H; Poulin EC; Mamazza J; Auer RC; Boushey RP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Sep; 55(9):970-5. PubMed ID: 22874604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision-making in rectal surgery.
    MacDermid E; Young CJ; Young J; Solomon M
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Mar; 16(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 24521275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between surgeon caseload and sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancer.
    Purves H; Pietrobon R; Hervey S; Guller U; Miller W; Ludwig K
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Feb; 48(2):195-202; discussion 202-4. PubMed ID: 15812583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Macroscopic assessment of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a useful tool for improving quality control in a multidisciplinary team.
    García-Granero E; Faiz O; Muñoz E; Flor B; Navarro S; Faus C; García-Botello SA; Lledó S; Cervantes A
    Cancer; 2009 Aug; 115(15):3400-11. PubMed ID: 19479978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
    Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability in the quality of rectal cancer care in public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain): clinical audit as a basis for action.
    Manchon-Walsh P; Borras JM; Espinas JA; Aliste L;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 21296543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.
    Iversen LH
    Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A diverting stoma is not necessary when performing a handsewn coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer.
    Huh JW; Park YA; Sohn SK
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jul; 50(7):1040-6. PubMed ID: 17525861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice.
    Wu R; Boushey R; Potter B; Stacey D
    BMC Surg; 2014 Mar; 14():16. PubMed ID: 24655353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
    Orsenigo E; Di Palo S; Vignali A; Staudacher C
    Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 1():S117-20. PubMed ID: 18023571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Large variation in the use of defunctioning stomas after rectal cancer surgery. A lack of consensus.
    Snijders HS; Kunneman M; Tollenaar RA; Boerma D; Pieterse AH; Wouters MJ; Stiggelbout AM
    Acta Oncol; 2016; 55(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 26449339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current practices in rectal cancer surgery: a survey of Thai colorectal surgeons.
    Lohsiriwat V; Lohsiriwat D; Thavichaigarn P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Aug; 92(8):1009-15. PubMed ID: 19694323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient and physician preferences for surgical and adjuvant treatment options for rectal cancer.
    Harrison JD; Solomon MJ; Young JM; Meagher A; Butow P; Salkeld G; Hruby G; Clarke S
    Arch Surg; 2008 Apr; 143(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 18427027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who performs proctectomy for rectal cancer in the United States?
    Ricciardi R; Roberts PL; Read TE; Baxter NN; Marcello PW; Schoetz DJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Oct; 54(10):1210-5. PubMed ID: 21904134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors associated with sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer at national comprehensive cancer network centers.
    Temple LK; Romanus D; Niland J; Veer AT; Weiser MR; Skibber J; Wilson J; Rajput A; Benson A; Wong YN; Schrag D
    Ann Surg; 2009 Aug; 250(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 19638922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.
    Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17235719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
    Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The surgeon as a prognostic factor in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer.
    Di Cataldo A; Scilletta B; Latino R; Cocuzza A; Li Destri G
    Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 1():S53-6. PubMed ID: 18023175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.