These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22607710)

  • 1. The case for including reach as a key element of program theory.
    Montague S; Porteous NL
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Feb; 36(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22607710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rethinking Evaluations of Health Equity Initiatives: an introduction to the special issue.
    Sridharan S; Tannahill C
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Feb; 36(1):153-6. PubMed ID: 22480563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semi-structured interview protocol for constructing logic models.
    Gugiu PC; Rodríguez-Campos L
    Eval Program Plann; 2007 Nov; 30(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 17905433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key issues in intervention research: a program evaluation perspective.
    Lipsey MW
    Am J Ind Med; 1996 Apr; 29(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 8728128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Logic models: a useful way to study theories of evaluation practice?
    Miller RL
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():77-80. PubMed ID: 22445548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia.
    Lawless A; Baum F; Delany-Crowe T; MacDougall C; Williams C; McDermott D; Eyk HV
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Jun; 7(6):510-521. PubMed ID: 29935128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of logic models in a large scientific research program.
    O'Keefe CM; Head RJ
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 Aug; 34(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 21555041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Program logic: a framework for health program design and evaluation - the Pap nurse in general practice program.
    Hallinan CM
    Aust J Prim Health; 2010; 16(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 21138700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating Medical Home constructs for children with special needs: integrating theory and logic models.
    Livingood WC; Winterbauer NL; McCaskill Q; Wood D
    Fam Community Health; 2007; 30(4):E1-15. PubMed ID: 17873632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When does a conceptual framework become a theory? Reflections from an accidental theorist.
    Cousins JB
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():67-70. PubMed ID: 22497774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using logic models to facilitate comparisons of evaluation theory.
    Alkin MC; Vo AT; Hansen M
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():33. PubMed ID: 22480564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Logic and evaluation theory.
    Greene JC
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():71-3. PubMed ID: 22465701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a logic model to relate the strategic to the tactical in program planning and evaluation: an illustration based on social norms interventions.
    Keller A; Bauerle JA
    Am J Health Promot; 2009; 24(2):89-92, ii. PubMed ID: 19928481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Logic models and content analyses for the explication of evaluation theories: the case of emergent realist evaluation.
    Mark MM; Henry GT
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():74-6. PubMed ID: 22459671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Program theory and logic model to address the co-occurrence of domestic violence and child maltreatment.
    Hill JR; Thies J
    Eval Program Plann; 2010 Nov; 33(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 20452671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ten steps to making evaluation matter.
    Sridharan S; Nakaima A
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 May; 34(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 20970856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of linear and systems thinking approaches for program evaluation illustrated using the Indiana Interdisciplinary GK-12.
    Dyehouse M; Bennett D; Harbor J; Childress A; Dark M
    Eval Program Plann; 2009 Aug; 32(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 19359040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
    Brousselle A; Champagne F
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 Feb; 34(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 20541262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What can practitioners learn from theorists' logic models?
    Gargani J
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():81-8. PubMed ID: 22469341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.