BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22607726)

  • 1. Does access to a colorectal cancer screening website and/or a nurse-managed telephone help line provided to patients by their family physician increase fecal occult blood test uptake?: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial study protocol.
    Clouston K; Katz A; Martens PJ; Sisler J; Turner D; Lobchuk M; McClement S;
    BMC Cancer; 2012 May; 12():182. PubMed ID: 22607726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does access to a colorectal cancer screening website and/or a nurse-managed telephone help line provided to patients by their family physician increase fecal occult blood test uptake?: results from a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Clouston K; Katz A; Martens PJ; Sisler J; Turner D; Lobchuk M; McClement S; Crow G;
    BMC Cancer; 2014 Apr; 14():263. PubMed ID: 24739235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Brenner AT; Getrich CM; Pignone M; Rhyne RL; Hoffman RM; McWilliams A; de Hernandez BU; Weaver MA; Tapp H; Harbi K; Reuland D
    Trials; 2014 Jul; 15():275. PubMed ID: 25004983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual colonoscopy, optical colonoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial.
    You JJ; Liu Y; Kirby J; Vora P; Moayyedi P
    Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():296. PubMed ID: 26156248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is the role of family in promoting faecal occult blood test screening? Exploring physician, average-risk individual, and family perceptions.
    Lobchuk MM; Bapuji SB; McClement SE; Sisler JJ; Katz A; Martens P; Turner D; Clouston K
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 36(3):e190-9. PubMed ID: 22310235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Jimbo M; Kelly-Blake K; Sen A; Hawley ST; Ruffin MT
    Trials; 2013 Nov; 14():381. PubMed ID: 24216139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using a continuum of hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies to put research-tested colorectal screening interventions into practice.
    Green BB; Coronado GD; Schwartz M; Coury J; Baldwin LM
    Implement Sci; 2019 May; 14(1):53. PubMed ID: 31142348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Walker JG; Macrae F; Winship I; Oberoi J; Saya S; Milton S; Bickerstaffe A; Dowty JG; De Abreu Lourenço R; Clark M; Galloway L; Fishman G; Walter FM; Flander L; Chondros P; Ait Ouakrim D; Pirotta M; Trevena L; Jenkins MA; Emery JD
    Trials; 2018 Jul; 19(1):397. PubMed ID: 30045764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protocol for population testing of an Internet-based Personalised Decision Support system for colorectal cancer screening.
    Wilson CJ; Flight IH; Zajac IT; Turnbull D; Young GP; Cole SR; Gregory T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2010 Sep; 10():50. PubMed ID: 20843369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised controlled trial of personalised decision support delivered via the internet for bowel cancer screening with a faecal occult blood test: the effects of tailoring of messages according to social cognitive variables on participation.
    Wilson CJ; Flight IH; Turnbull D; Gregory T; Cole SR; Young GP; Zajac IT
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Apr; 15():25. PubMed ID: 25886492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to colorectal cancer screening among patients cared for in a community health center.
    Baker DW; Brown T; Buchanan DR; Weil J; Cameron KA; Ranalli L; Ferreira MR; Stephens Q; Balsley K; Goldman SN; Wolf MS
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Apr; 13():153. PubMed ID: 23627550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sequist TD; Zaslavsky AM; Marshall R; Fletcher RH; Ayanian JZ
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Feb; 169(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 19237720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Follow-up approaches to a health literacy intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in rural community clinics: A randomized controlled trial.
    Arnold CL; Rademaker AW; Morris JD; Ferguson LA; Wiltz G; Davis TC
    Cancer; 2019 Oct; 125(20):3615-3622. PubMed ID: 31355924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial.
    Baker DW; Brown T; Buchanan DR; Weil J; Balsley K; Ranalli L; Lee JY; Cameron KA; Ferreira MR; Stephens Q; Goldman SN; Rademaker A; Wolf MS
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Aug; 174(8):1235-41. PubMed ID: 24934845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A national survey of primary care physicians' methods for screening for fecal occult blood.
    Nadel MR; Shapiro JA; Klabunde CN; Seeff LC; Uhler R; Smith RA; Ransohoff DF
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jan; 142(2):86-94. PubMed ID: 15657156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The LEAD trial - the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Gabel P; Larsen MB; Kirkegaard P; Edwards A; Andersen B
    Trials; 2018 Oct; 19(1):543. PubMed ID: 30305114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of changing stool collection processes on compliance in nationwide organized screening using a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in Korea: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Shin HY; Suh M; Baik HW; Choi KS; Park B; Jun JK; Lee CW; Oh JH; Lee YK; Han DS; Lee DH
    Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():461. PubMed ID: 25428164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tailored telephone counselling to increase participation of underusers in a population-based colorectal cancer-screening programme with faecal occult blood test: A randomized controlled trial.
    Denis B; Broc G; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Gana K; Perrin P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2017 Feb; 65(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28089385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial.
    Coronado GD; Vollmer WM; Petrik A; Taplin SH; Burdick TE; Meenan RT; Green BB
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Jul; 38(2):344-9. PubMed ID: 24937017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Barriers to completing colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test.
    Azulay R; Valinsky L; Hershkowitz F; Elran E; Lederman N; Kariv R; Braunstein B; Heymann A
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2021 Feb; 10(1):11. PubMed ID: 33573698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.