These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22609086)

  • 21. Mouth level smoke exposure using analysis of filters from smoked cigarettes: a study of eight countries.
    Mariner DC; Ashley M; Shepperd CJ; Mullard G; Dixon M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Dec; 61(3 Suppl):S39-50. PubMed ID: 20510323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Consumer and health literacy: The need to better design tobacco-cessation product packaging, labels, and inserts.
    Weiss SM; Smith-Simone SY
    Am J Prev Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3 Suppl):S403-13. PubMed ID: 20176315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do larger pictorial health warnings diminish the need for plain packaging of cigarettes?
    Wakefield M; Germain D; Durkin S; Hammond D; Goldberg M; Borland R
    Addiction; 2012 Jun; 107(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 22372966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimation and correlation of cigarette smoke exposure in Canadian smokers as determined by filter analysis and biomarkers of exposure.
    Morin A; Shepperd CJ; Eldridge AC; Poirier N; Voisine R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Dec; 61(3 Suppl):S3-12. PubMed ID: 20937342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Divergence between strength indicators in packaging and cigarette engineering: a case study of Marlboro varieties in Australia and the USA.
    King B; Borland R; Abdul-Salaam S; Polzin G; Ashley D; Watson C; O'Connor RJ
    Tob Control; 2010 Oct; 19(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 20530138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers.
    Hoek J; Wong C; Gendall P; Louviere J; Cong K
    Tob Control; 2011 May; 20(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 20966135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. South African farm workers' interpretation of risk assessment data expressed as pictograms on pesticide labels.
    Rother HA
    Environ Res; 2008 Nov; 108(3):419-27. PubMed ID: 18755451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Graphic warning labels on plain cigarette packs: will they make a difference to adolescents?
    McCool J; Webb L; Cameron LD; Hoek J
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Apr; 74(8):1269-73. PubMed ID: 22385817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of current U.S. and Canadian cigarette pack warnings.
    Nimbarte A; Aghazadeh F; Harvey C
    Int Q Community Health Educ; 2005-2006; 24(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 17690048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modified tobacco use and lifestyle change in risk-reducing beliefs about smoking.
    Haddock CK; Lando H; Klesges RC; Peterson AL; Scarinci IC
    Am J Prev Med; 2004 Jul; 27(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 15212773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cannabis labelling and consumer understanding of THC levels and serving sizes.
    Leos-Toro C; Fong GT; Meyer SB; Hammond D
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2020 Mar; 208():107843. PubMed ID: 32044091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A consumer evaluation of health warning labels on cigarette packages in Canada.
    Crane FG; MacLean VA
    Health Mark Q; 1996; 13(3):47-57. PubMed ID: 10158488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Information disclosure and smoking risk perceptions. Potential short-term impact on Spanish students of the new European Union directive on tobacco products.
    Portillo F; Antoñanzas F
    Eur J Public Health; 2002 Dec; 12(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 12506505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reading the small print - labelling recommendations for orthopaedic implants.
    Haene RA; Sandhu RS; Baxandall R
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Nov; 91(8):653-7. PubMed ID: 19686615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Australian patterns of tobacco smoking and related health beliefs in 1983.
    Hill D; Gray N
    Community Health Stud; 1984; 8(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 6518750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are common language effect sizes easier to understand than traditional effect sizes?
    Brooks ME; Dalal DK; Nolan KP
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Mar; 99(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 24188393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is a cigarette brand with fewer chemicals safer? Public perceptions in two national US experiments.
    Byron MJ; Lazard AJ; Brewer NT
    J Behav Med; 2022 Oct; 45(5):812-817. PubMed ID: 35688959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Increasing Effectiveness of Messages about Chemicals in Cigarette Smoke.
    Morgan JC; Moracco KE; Mendel JR; Kelley DE; Noar SM; Brewer NT
    Tob Regul Sci; 2018 Jul; 4(4):50-62. PubMed ID: 34141828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of Graphic Warning Messages on Intentions to Use Alternate Tobacco Products.
    Morgan JC; Sutton JA; Yang S; Cappella JN
    J Health Commun; 2020 Aug; 25(8):613-623. PubMed ID: 33063619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Design cues for tobacco communication: Heuristic interpretations and usability of online health information about harmful chemicals.
    Lazard AJ
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Sep; 141():104177. PubMed ID: 32521448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.