These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22609138)

  • 1. Value of information methods for planning and analyzing clinical studies optimize decision making and research planning.
    Willan AR; Goeree R; Boutis K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Aug; 65(8):870-6. PubMed ID: 22609138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical decision making and the expected value of information.
    Willan AR
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 17715257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence.
    Siebert U; Rochau U; Claxton K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):575-84. PubMed ID: 24315327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining optimal sample sizes for multi-stage randomized clinical trials using value of information methods.
    Willan A; Kowgier M
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 18697843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal sample size determinations from an industry perspective based on the expected value of information.
    Willan AR
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 19029207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value of information methods to design a clinical trial in a small population to optimise a health economic utility function.
    Pearce M; Hee SW; Madan J; Posch M; Day S; Miller F; Zohar S; Stallard N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Feb; 18(1):20. PubMed ID: 29422021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision analysis to complete diagnostic research by closing the gap between test characteristics and cost-effectiveness.
    Schaafsma JD; van der Graaf Y; Rinkel GJ; Buskens E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 19364636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value of information analyses of economic randomized controlled trials: the treatment of intermittent claudication.
    Groot Koerkamp B; Spronk S; Stijnen T; Hunink MG
    Value Health; 2010; 13(2):242-50. PubMed ID: 19818058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of information and optimal clinical trial design.
    Willan AR; Pinto EM
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1791-806. PubMed ID: 15806619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accounting for between-study variation in incremental net benefit in value of information methodology.
    Willan AR; Eckermann S
    Health Econ; 2012 Oct; 21(10):1183-95. PubMed ID: 21882285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining optimal sample sizes for multistage adaptive randomized clinical trials from an industry perspective using value of information methods.
    Chen MH; Willan AR
    Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 23263520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value of information analysis optimizing future trial design from a pilot study on catheter securement devices.
    Tuffaha HW; Reynolds H; Gordon LG; Rickard CM; Scuffham PA
    Clin Trials; 2014 Dec; 11(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 25084784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Planning a cluster randomized controlled trial: methodological issues.
    Christie J; O'Halloran P; Stevenson M
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19289934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
    Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A behavioural Bayes approach to the determination of sample size for clinical trials considering efficacy and safety: imbalanced sample size in treatment groups.
    Kikuchi T; Gittins J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Aug; 20(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 20223784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expected value of information and decision making in HTA.
    Eckermann S; Willan AR
    Health Econ; 2007 Feb; 16(2):195-209. PubMed ID: 16981193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of value of information: best informing research design and prioritization using current methods.
    Eckermann S; Karnon J; Willan AR
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(9):699-709. PubMed ID: 20629473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-level resampling as a novel method for the calculation of the expected value of sample information in economic trials.
    Sadatsafavi M; Marra C; Bryan S
    Health Econ; 2013 Jul; 22(7):877-82. PubMed ID: 22933363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials.
    Lewsey JD; Leyland AH; Murray GD; Boddy FA
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(22):1-55. PubMed ID: 11074392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.