143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22609380)
21. Guiding principles for the implementation of non-animal safety assessment approaches for cosmetics: skin sensitisation.
Goebel C; Aeby P; Ade N; Alépée N; Aptula A; Araki D; Dufour E; Gilmour N; Hibatallah J; Keller D; Kern P; Kirst A; Marrec-Fairley M; Maxwell G; Rowland J; Safford B; Schellauf F; Schepky A; Seaman C; Teichert T; Tessier N; Teissier S; Weltzien HU; Winkler P; Scheel J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jun; 63(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 22374415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cosmetovigilance in India: Need of the day.
Sarma P; Kumar H; Medhi B
Indian J Pharmacol; 2017; 49(5):341-343. PubMed ID: 29515273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Cosmetovigilance: the 'beautiful' risk.
Moretti U; Velo G
Drug Saf; 2008; 31(5):437-9. PubMed ID: 18422387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Safety assessment of personal care products/cosmetics and their ingredients.
Nohynek GJ; Antignac E; Re T; Toutain H
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(2):239-59. PubMed ID: 20005888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predicting skin sensitization potential and inter-laboratory reproducibility of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) in the European Cosmetics Association (COLIPA) ring trials.
Sakaguchi H; Ryan C; Ovigne JM; Schroeder KR; Ashikaga T
Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Sep; 24(6):1810-20. PubMed ID: 20510347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Human health safety evaluation of cosmetics in the EU: a legally imposed challenge to science.
Pauwels M; Rogiers V
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(2):260-74. PubMed ID: 20006634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Sanitary control of cosmetics].
Bonini M; Pellino P; Pilla M
Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2005; 61(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 17206194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Safety assurance of cosmetics in Japan: current situation and future prospects.
Inomata S
J Oleo Sci; 2014; 63(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24389794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of sun protection factors determined by an in vivo and different in vitro methodologies: a study with 58 different commercially available sunscreen products.
Heinrich U; Tronnier H; Kockott D; Kuckuk R; Heise HM
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2004 Apr; 26(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 18494916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Test guidelines for assessment of skin compatibility of cosmetic finished products in man. Task Force of COLIPA.
Walker AP; Basketter DA; Baverel M; Diembeck W; Matthies W; Mougin D; Paye M; Röthlisberger R; Dupuis J
Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 Jul; 34(7):651-60. PubMed ID: 8761358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Surveillance of dermo-cosmetic products: a global cosmetovigilance system to optimise product development and consumer safety.
Ribet V; Albinet Claudin L; Brinio E; Berthier A; Millet V; Halbeher C; Sauvaire L; Laborderie M; Lafosse S; Olivan A; Giordano Labadie F; Ferret PJ
Eur J Dermatol; 2021 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 34463281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Derivatization procedure and HPLC determination of 2-ethoxyethanol in cosmetic samples.
Mariani E; Villa C; Neuhoff C; Dorato S
Int J Cosmet Sci; 1999 Jun; 21(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 18505541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Final report on the safety assessment of human placental protein, hydrolyzed human placental protein, human placental enzymes, human placental lipids, human umbilical extract, placental protein, hydrolyzed placental protein, placental enzymes, placental lipids, and umbilical extract.
Nair B; Elmore AR;
Int J Toxicol; 2002; 21 Suppl 1():81-91. PubMed ID: 12042062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Chances and limits of an improved method to assess water resistance of cosmetic sunscreen products in vitro on polymethylmethacrylate plates.
Bielfeldt S; Röck C; Wilhelm KP
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2013 Feb; 35(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 22970811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Prevalence of cosmetic sensitivity among beauticians].
Sánchez Palacios A; Shaman F; Garcá JA; Sánchez Palacios MA
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 1995; 23(4):148-52. PubMed ID: 8553988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Final report of the safety assessment of Alcohol Denat., including SD Alcohol 3-A, SD Alcohol 30, SD Alcohol 39, SD Alcohol 39-B, SD Alcohol 39-C, SD Alcohol 40, SD Alcohol 40-B, and SD Alcohol 40-C, and the denaturants, Quassin, Brucine Sulfate/Brucine, and Denatonium Benzoate.
Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel
Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 1():1-43. PubMed ID: 18569160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products.
Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 4():1-82. PubMed ID: 19101832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cosmetovigilance survey: are cosmetics considered safe by consumers?
Di Giovanni C; Arcoraci V; Gambardella L; Sautebin L
Pharmacol Res; 2006 Jan; 53(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 16183300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A quantitative approach of using genetic algorithm in designing a probability scoring system of an adverse drug reaction assessment system.
Koh Y; Yap CW; Li SC
Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jun; 77(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 17921048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Screening of repeated dose toxicity data present in SCC(NF)P/SCCS safety evaluations of cosmetic ingredients.
Vinken M; Pauwels M; Ates G; Vivier M; Vanhaecke T; Rogiers V
Arch Toxicol; 2012 Mar; 86(3):405-12. PubMed ID: 22038139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
