These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22609529)

  • 1. Analysis of collection systems for sorted household waste in Spain.
    Gallardo A; Bovea MD; Colomer FJ; Prades M
    Waste Manag; 2012 Sep; 32(9):1623-33. PubMed ID: 22609529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different collection systems for sorted household waste in Spain.
    Gallardo A; Bovea MD; Colomer FJ; Prades M; Carlos M
    Waste Manag; 2010 Dec; 30(12):2430-9. PubMed ID: 20598872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evolution of sorted waste collection: a case study of Spanish cities.
    Gallardo A; Bovea MD; Mendoza FJ; Prades M
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Aug; 30(8):859-63. PubMed ID: 22605023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental assessment of alternative municipal solid waste management strategies. A Spanish case study.
    Bovea MD; Ibáñez-Forés V; Gallardo A; Colomer-Mendoza FJ
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2383-95. PubMed ID: 20381331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A case study of packaging waste collection systems in Portugal - Part I: Performance and operation analysis.
    Martinho G; Gomes A; Santos P; Ramos M; Cardoso J; Silveira A; Pires A
    Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():96-107. PubMed ID: 28161334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of collection schemes for packaging and other recyclable waste in European Union-28 Member States and capital cities.
    Seyring N; Dollhofer M; Weißenbacher J; Bakas I; McKinnon D
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):947-56. PubMed ID: 27357560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Waste collection systems for recyclables: an environmental and economic assessment for the municipality of Aarhus (Denmark).
    Larsen AW; Merrild H; Møller J; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2010 May; 30(5):744-54. PubMed ID: 19945262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Charging systems and PAYT experiences for waste management in Spain.
    Puig-Ventosa I
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2767-71. PubMed ID: 18783932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing recycling versus incineration of key materials in municipal waste: The importance of efficient energy recovery and transport distances.
    Merrild H; Larsen AW; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):1009-18. PubMed ID: 22265239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indicators of waste management efficiency related to different territorial conditions.
    Passarini F; Vassura I; Monti F; Morselli L; Villani B
    Waste Manag; 2011 Apr; 31(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 21216584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Model for the separate collection of packaging waste in Portuguese low-performing recycling regions.
    Oliveira V; Sousa V; Vaz JM; Dias-Ferreira C
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 216():13-24. PubMed ID: 28468731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitude towards the incorporation of the selective collection of biowaste in a municipal solid waste management system. A case study.
    Bernad-Beltrán D; Simó A; Bovea MD
    Waste Manag; 2014 Dec; 34(12):2434-44. PubMed ID: 25266157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of MSW in Spain and recovery of packaging steel scrap.
    Tayibi H; Peña C; López FA; López-Delgado A
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(11):1655-65. PubMed ID: 17161595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inconsistent pathways of household waste.
    Dahlén L; Berg H; Lagerkvist A; Berg PE
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jun; 29(6):1798-806. PubMed ID: 19167877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying the key factors in increasing recycling and reducing residual household waste: a case study of the Flemish region of Belgium.
    Gellynck X; Jacobsen R; Verhelst P
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2683-90. PubMed ID: 21704444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door-to-door system.
    Punkkinen H; Merta E; Teerioja N; Moliis K; Kuvaja E
    Waste Manag; 2012 Oct; 32(10):1775-81. PubMed ID: 22647502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors determining waste generation in Spanish towns and cities.
    Prades M; Gallardo A; Ibàñez MV
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Jan; 187(1):4098. PubMed ID: 25492706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different collection systems for sorted household waste in Sweden.
    Dahlén L; Vukicevic S; Meijer JE; Lagerkvist A
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(10):1298-305. PubMed ID: 17010597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical, economic and environmental analysis of a MSW kerbside separate collection system applied to small communities.
    De Feo G; Malvano C
    Waste Manag; 2012 Oct; 32(10):1760-74. PubMed ID: 22677016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors that affect the quality of the bio-waste fraction of selectively collected solid waste in Catalonia.
    Alvarez MD; Sans R; Garrido N; Torres A
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(2):359-66. PubMed ID: 17376669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.