These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22609577)

  • 1. Auditory skills and brain morphology predict individual differences in adaptation to degraded speech.
    Erb J; Henry MJ; Eisner F; Obleser J
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2154-64. PubMed ID: 22609577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The brain dynamics of rapid perceptual adaptation to adverse listening conditions.
    Erb J; Henry MJ; Eisner F; Obleser J
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 33(26):10688-97. PubMed ID: 23804092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relations between perceptual measures of temporal processing, auditory-evoked brainstem responses and speech intelligibility in noise.
    Papakonstantinou A; Strelcyk O; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):30-7. PubMed ID: 21354285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional asymmetries in the representation of noise-vocoded speech.
    Millman RE; Woods WP; Quinlan PT
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):2364-73. PubMed ID: 20946961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid perceptual learning of noise-vocoded speech requires attention.
    Huyck JJ; Johnsrude IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL236-42. PubMed ID: 22423814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
    Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controlling for individual differences in fMRI brain activation to tones, syllables, and words.
    Rimol LM; Specht K; Hugdahl K
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 16343948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does training with amplitude modulated tones affect tone-vocoded speech perception?
    Casaponsa A; Sohoglu E; Moore DR; Füllgrabe C; Molloy K; Amitay S
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226288. PubMed ID: 31881550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations.
    Eisner F; McGettigan C; Faulkner A; Rosen S; Scott SK
    J Neurosci; 2010 May; 30(21):7179-86. PubMed ID: 20505085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech.
    McLaughlin DJ; Baese-Berk MM; Bent T; Borrie SA; Van Engen KJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1559-1570. PubMed ID: 29740795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral and fMRI evidence that cognitive ability modulates the effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Heslenfeld DJ; Rönnberg J
    Brain Lang; 2012 Aug; 122(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 22728131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multisensory integration sites identified by perception of spatial wavelet filtered visual speech gesture information.
    Callan DE; Jones JA; Munhall K; Kroos C; Callan AM; Vatikiotis-Bateson E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):805-16. PubMed ID: 15200708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Song and speech: brain regions involved with perception and covert production.
    Callan DE; Tsytsarev V; Hanakawa T; Callan AM; Katsuhara M; Fukuyama H; Turner R
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(3):1327-42. PubMed ID: 16546406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition and working memory capacity in young-elderly listeners: effects of hearing sensitivity.
    Cervera TC; Soler MJ; Dasi C; Ruiz JC
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):216-26. PubMed ID: 19739905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atypical processing of auditory temporal complexity in autistics.
    Samson F; Hyde KL; Bertone A; Soulières I; Mendrek A; Ahad P; Mottron L; Zeffiro TA
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):546-55. PubMed ID: 21192958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception.
    Dehaene-Lambertz G; Pallier C; Serniclaes W; Sprenger-Charolles L; Jobert A; Dehaene S
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 15588593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.