These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22610168)

  • 21. Mid-course sample size modification in clinical trials based on the observed treatment effect.
    Jennison C; Turnbull BW
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):971-93. PubMed ID: 12627413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Targeting population entering phase III trials: a new stratified adaptive phase II design.
    Tournoux-Facon C; De Rycke Y; Tubert-Bitter P
    Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(8):801-11. PubMed ID: 21432875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Flexible two-stage design with sample size reassessment for survival trials.
    Desseaux K; Porcher R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5002-13. PubMed ID: 17577242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sample size adjustment based on promising interim results and its application in confirmatory clinical trials.
    Chen YH; Li C; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2015 Dec; 12(6):584-95. PubMed ID: 26195615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A seamless phase II/III design with sample-size re-estimation.
    Bischoff W; Miller F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):595-609. PubMed ID: 20183428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statistical aspects of the TNK-S2B trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: an efficient, dose-adaptive, seamless phase II/III design.
    Levin B; Thompson JL; Chakraborty B; Levy G; MacArthur R; Haley EC
    Clin Trials; 2011 Aug; 8(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 21737464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flexible design of two-stage adaptive procedures for phase III clinical trials.
    Koyama T
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 17307399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An adaptive group sequential design for phase II/III clinical trials that select a single treatment from several.
    Kelly PJ; Stallard N; Todd S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):641-58. PubMed ID: 16022169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adaptive increase in sample size when interim results are promising: a practical guide with examples.
    Mehta CR; Pocock SJ
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3267-84. PubMed ID: 22105690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interim futility analysis with intermediate endpoints.
    Goldman B; LeBlanc M; Crowley J
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 18283075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical safety evaluation of combination vaccines.
    Midthun K; Horne AD; Goldenthal KL
    Dev Biol Stand; 1998; 95():245-9. PubMed ID: 9855438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
    Chen K; Shan M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Add-Arm Design for Unimodal Response Curve with Unknown Mode.
    Chang M; Wang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):1039-64. PubMed ID: 25331003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A flexible design for multiple armed screening trials.
    Sargent DJ; Goldberg RM
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1051-60. PubMed ID: 11276035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A flexible multi-stage design for phase II oncology trials.
    Tan MT; Xiong X
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 22328328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A composite design for transition from a preliminary to a full-scale study.
    Lachin JM; Younes N
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5014-32. PubMed ID: 17577245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
    Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adaptive methods: telling "the rest of the story".
    Emerson SS; Fleming TR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1150-65. PubMed ID: 21058111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Increasing the sample size when the unblinded interim result is promising.
    Chen YH; DeMets DL; Lan KK
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1023-38. PubMed ID: 15057876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
    Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.