198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22610332)
1. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular bilateral sagitta1 split ramus osteotomy with rigid internal fixation].
Yin HW; Lin N; Guan J; Zhang GL
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Apr; 21(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 22610332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Establishment and primary analysis of the three-dimensional finite element model of mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid internal fixation].
Xu CT; Sun GL; Zhou J; Wang PL
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 May; 23(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 17649942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the rigidity of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixation using four designs of biodegradable and titanium plates--a numerical study.
Albougha S; Albogha MH; Darwich MA; Darwich K
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 19(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 25784154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of stress distribution in resorbable screw fixation system: three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular setback surgery with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Choi JP; Baek SH; Choi JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1104-9. PubMed ID: 20613578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in sagittal split ramus osteotomies.
Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kılınc Y; Arslan M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 26755233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Bone Fixation in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Using Individual Models.
Tamura N; Takaki T; Takano N; Shibahara T
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018; 59(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 29962423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Finite element study of maxillary Le Fort-I osteotomy with rigid internal fixation].
Zhou J; Sun GL; Wu W; Xu CT; Wang PL
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 May; 26(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 20737946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the stress distribution of microtitanium and bioresorbable plates in fixation of mandibulotomy].
Han J; Xie DP; Wang HS; Zhou ZJ; Liu JN
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2020 Jun; 29(3):237-241. PubMed ID: 33043338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro study of a modified sagittal split osteotomy fixation technique of the mandible: a mechanical test.
Sonego CL; Scheffer MAR; Chagas Júnior OL; Vetromilla BM; Fernandes LP; Ozkomur A; Silva Júnior AN; Miguens Júnior SAQ; Hernandez PAG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1330-1335. PubMed ID: 29655819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques.
Chuong CJ; Borotikar B; Schwartz-Dabney C; Sinn DP
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 15635560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the effect of mandibular length and height on the sagittal split ramus osteotomy rigid internal fixation techniques: A finite element analysis.
Ergezen Ozasir E; Tosun E; Tuz HH
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 121(6):652-657. PubMed ID: 32068168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The establishment of digital model about sagittal split ramus osteotomy and stability analysis of 3 different fixation methods].
Yin XM; Zhang JW; Ren XX; Xu GX; Liu X
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2013 Jun; 22(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 23852049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of bone formation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using different fixation materials.
Ueki K; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Ikawa H; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Saida Y
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):710-6. PubMed ID: 25887426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kilinc Y; Arslan M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 27022805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A customized fixation plate with novel structure designed by topological optimization for mandibular angle fracture based on finite element analysis.
Liu YF; Fan YY; Jiang XF; Baur DA
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Nov; 16(1):131. PubMed ID: 29141673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis of 3D-printed personalized titanium plates for mandibular angle fracture.
Li Y; Li H; Lai Q; Xue R; Zhu K; Deng Y
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023 Jan; 26(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 35587215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
