These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22611182)
1. A randomized study comparing three groups of vein harvesting methods for coronary artery bypass grafting: endoscopic harvest versus standard bridging and open techniques. Krishnamoorthy B; Critchley WR; Glover AT; Nair J; Jones MT; Waterworth PD; Fildes JE; Yonan N Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2012 Aug; 15(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 22611182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Leg Wound Complications: A Comparison Between Endoscopic and Open Saphenous Vein Harvesting Techniques. Mubarak Y; Abdeljawad A Heart Surg Forum; 2021 Jul; 24(4):E604-E610. PubMed ID: 34473031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein graft harvest for lower extremity bypass in critical limb ischemia. Eid RE; Wang L; Kuzman M; Abu-Hamad G; Singh M; Marone LK; Leers SA; Chaer RA J Vasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 59(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 24370082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Open versus endoscopic great saphenous vein harvest for lower extremity revascularization of critical limb ischemia. Santo VJ; Dargon PT; Azarbal AF; Liem TK; Mitchell EL; Moneta GL; Landry GJ J Vasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 59(2):427-34. PubMed ID: 24103407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial. Andreasen JJ; Nekrasas V; Dethlefsen C Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 18508277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved leg wound healing with endoscopic saphenous vein harvest in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective randomized study in Asian population. Au WK; Chiu SW; Sun MP; Lam KT; Lin MF; Chui WH; Yeung CL; Cheng LC J Card Surg; 2008; 23(6):633-7. PubMed ID: 19016987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic greater saphenous vein harvesting reduces the morbidity of coronary artery bypass surgery. Felisky CD; Paull DL; Hill ME; Hall RA; Ditkoff M; Campbell WG; Guyton SW Am J Surg; 2002 May; 183(5):576-9. PubMed ID: 12034397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experienced operators achieve superior patency and wound complication rates with endoscopic great saphenous vein harvest compared with open harvest in lower extremity bypasses. Kronick M; Liem TK; Jung E; Abraham CZ; Moneta GL; Landry GJ J Vasc Surg; 2019 Nov; 70(5):1534-1542. PubMed ID: 31153700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic versus open great saphenous vein harvesting for femoral to popliteal artery bypass. Mirza AK; Stauffer K; Fleming MD; De Martino R; Oderich G; Kalra M; Gloviczki P; Bower T J Vasc Surg; 2018 Apr; 67(4):1199-1206. PubMed ID: 29102747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic vein harvest does not negatively affect patency of great saphenous vein lower extremity bypass. Khan SZ; Rivero M; McCraith B; Harris LM; Dryjski ML; Dosluoglu HH J Vasc Surg; 2016 Jun; 63(6):1546-54. PubMed ID: 27005753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mid-term outcomes for Endoscopic versus Open Vein Harvest: a case control study. Kirmani BH; Barnard JB; Mourad F; Blakeman N; Chetcuti K; Zacharias J J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 May; 5():44. PubMed ID: 20509873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic vein harvest: advantages and limitations. Bonde P; Graham AN; MacGowan SW Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 77(6):2076-82. PubMed ID: 15172271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative analysis of saphenous vein conduit harvesting techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting--standard bridging versus the open technique. Khan UA; Krishnamoorthy B; Najam O; Waterworth P; Fildes JE; Yonan N Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 10(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19696051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest for femoral to below the knee arterial bypass using saphenous vein graft. Gazoni LM; Carty R; Skinner J; Cherry KJ; Harthun NL; Kron IL; Tribble CG; Kern JA J Vasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 44(2):282-7; discussion 287-8. PubMed ID: 16890854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Complications after Endoscopic or Surgical Saphenous Vein Harvesting. Filip T; Schröther F; Haase R; Rudolph N; Claus T; Albes JM Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Dec; 68(8):700-705. PubMed ID: 30947354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative results of endoscopic and open methods of vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized parallel-group trial. Chernyavskiy A; Volkov A; Lavrenyuk O; Terekhov I; Kareva Y J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Nov; 10():163. PubMed ID: 26563714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Saphenous vein harvest with SaphLITE system versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study. Wang S; Tang H; Wilkinson V; Lukat T; Gelfand ET; Koshal A; Modry DL; Mullen JC; Hao C; Finegan BA Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):2018-23. PubMed ID: 15919302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ouzounian M; Hassan A; Buth KJ; MacPherson C; Ali IM; Hirsch GM; Ali IS Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 89(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 20103309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: the effect on postoperative outcomes. Hayward TZ; Hey LA; Newman LL; Duhaylongsod FG; Hayward KA; Lowe JE; Smith PK Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Dec; 68(6):2107-10; discussion 2110-1. PubMed ID: 10616985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. Kiaii B; Moon BC; Massel D; Langlois Y; Austin TW; Willoughby A; Guiraudon C; Howard CR; Guo LR J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Feb; 123(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 11828277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]