These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22611297)

  • 1. High-throughput DNA methylation datasets for evaluating false discovery rate methodologies.
    Asomaning N; Archer KJ
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2012 Jun; 56(6):1748-1756. PubMed ID: 22611297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SOME STEP-DOWN PROCEDURES CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE UNDER DEPENDENCE.
    Ge Y; Sealfon SC; Speed TP
    Stat Sin; 2008; 18(3):881-904. PubMed ID: 19018297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controlling the false discovery rate with constraints: the Newman-Keuls test revisited.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 17342955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Ann Stat; 2011 Feb; 39(1):556-583. PubMed ID: 25018568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD; Xu H
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 30(14):2018-25. PubMed ID: 24632499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classes of Multiple Decision Functions Strongly Controlling FWER and FDR.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Metrika; 2015 Jul; 78(5):563-595. PubMed ID: 26166847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bon-EV: an improved multiple testing procedure for controlling false discovery rates.
    Li D; Xie Z; Zand M; Fogg T; Dye T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):1. PubMed ID: 28049414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revisiting the genome-wide significance threshold for common variant GWAS.
    Chen Z; Boehnke M; Wen X; Mukherjee B
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33585870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controlling false discoveries in multidimensional directional decisions, with applications to gene expression data on ordered categories.
    Guo W; Sarkar SK; Peddada SD
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 19645703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modifying the false discovery rate procedure based on the information theory under arbitrary correlation structure and its performance in high-dimensional genomic data.
    Rastaghi S; Saki A; Tabesh H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):57. PubMed ID: 38317067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
    Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel approach to minimize false discovery rate in genome-wide data analysis.
    Bei Y; Hong P
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S1. PubMed ID: 24564975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
    Qian HR; Huang S
    Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An adaptive single-step FDR procedure with applications to DNA microarray analysis.
    Iyer V; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 17342954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate.
    Wu G; Wan X; Xu B
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 6):567. PubMed ID: 30367581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A direct approach to estimating false discovery rates conditional on covariates.
    Boca SM; Leek JT
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e6035. PubMed ID: 30581661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of dependence in high-dimensional multiple testing problems.
    Kim KI; van de Wiel MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():114. PubMed ID: 18298808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using alpha wisely: improving power to detect multiple QTL.
    Simonsen KL; McIntyre LM
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article1. PubMed ID: 16646787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.