These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Stimulus control by same-versus-different relations among multiple visual stimuli. Wasserman EA; Frank AJ; Young ME J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):347-57. PubMed ID: 12395492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Teaching relational discrimination to individuals with mental retardation: some problems and possible solutions. McIlvane WJ; Dube WV; Kledaras JB; Iennaco FM; Stoddard LT Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Nov; 95(3):283-96. PubMed ID: 2261161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blank-comparison assessment of stimulus-stimulus relations in individuals with mental retardation: a methodological note. Serna RW; Wilkinson KM; McIlvane WJ Am J Ment Retard; 1998 Jul; 103(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 9678231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians. Wright AA; Katz JS Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):234-54. PubMed ID: 16621333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning from explaining: does it matter if mom is listening? Rittle-Johnson B; Saylor M; Swygert KE J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Jul; 100(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 18022183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Children's performance on "animal tests" of oddity: implications for cognitive processes required for tests of oddity and delayed nonmatch to sample. Overman W; Bachevalier J; Miller M; Moore K J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Jul; 62(2):223-42. PubMed ID: 8683187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acquisition and transfer of sorting mechanisms in discrimination learning and free recall by nursery school children. Bozinou E; Goulet LR Child Dev; 1974 Sep; 45(3):816-20. PubMed ID: 4143836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults. Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence for an age-independent process in category learning. Livingston KR; Andrews JK Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15985065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oddity and match-to-sample tasks as the components of a chained schedule with retarded children. Smeets PM; Striefel S Am J Ment Defic; 1974 Jan; 78(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 4812943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of type and amount of pretraining on transfer in concept formation. Schroth ML J Gen Psychol; 2000 Jul; 127(3):261-9. PubMed ID: 10975425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of frequency of feedback on transfer in concept identification. Schroth ML Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 9100341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structure mapping in the comparison process. Markman AB; Gentner D Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(4):501-38. PubMed ID: 11131741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients]. Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Group differences and individual classification accuracy associated with letter/word oddity problems. Scott MS; Greenfield DB; Partridge MF; Gold S Am J Ment Retard; 1991 Jan; 95(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 2003910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]