These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22611857)
1. Implementation of a marine reserve has a rapid but short-lived effect on recreational angler use. Fujitani ML; Fenichel EP; Torre J; Gerber LR Ecol Appl; 2012 Mar; 22(2):597-605. PubMed ID: 22611857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Habitat damage, marine reserves, and the value of spatial management. Moeller HV; Neubert MG Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):959-71. PubMed ID: 23967568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lack of cross-scale linkages reduces robustness of community-based fisheries management. Cudney-Bueno R; Basurto X PLoS One; 2009 Jul; 4(7):e6253. PubMed ID: 19606210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temperate marine reserves enhance targeted but not untargeted fishes in multiple no-take MPAs. Tetreault I; Ambrose RF Ecol Appl; 2007 Dec; 17(8):2251-67. PubMed ID: 18213966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporation of recreational fishing effort into design of marine protected areas. Lynch TP Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1466-76. PubMed ID: 17002764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regional differences in fishing behavior determine whether a marine reserve network enhances fishery yield. Lenihan HS; Reed DC; Vigo M; Leiphardt C; Hofmiester JKK; Gallagher JP; Voss C; Moore P; Miller RJ Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1242. PubMed ID: 38216603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collaborative assessment of California spiny lobster population and fishery responses to a marine reserve network. Kay MC; Lenihan HS; Guenther CM; Wilson JR; Miller CJ; Shrout SW Ecol Appl; 2012 Jan; 22(1):322-35. PubMed ID: 22471093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Angler and environmental influences on walleye Sander vitreus and muskellunge Esox masquinongy angler catch in Escanaba Lake, Wisconsin 2003-2015. Shaw SL; Renik KM; Sass GG PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257882. PubMed ID: 34591910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marine reserve benefits and recreational fishing yields: The winners and the losers. Kayal M; Cigala M; Cambra E; Soulat N; Mercader M; Lebras A; Ivanoff P; Sébési L; Lassus-Debat A; Hartmann V; Bradtke M; Lenfant P; Jabouin C; Dubreuil J; Pelletier D; Joguet M; Le Mellionnec S; Brichet M; Binche JL; Payrot J; Saragoni G; Crec'hriou R; Verdoit-Jarraya M PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0237685. PubMed ID: 33301445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of sex change on the implications of marine reserves for fisheries. Chan NC; Connolly SR; Mapstone BD Ecol Appl; 2012 Apr; 22(3):778-91. PubMed ID: 22645810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large recovery of fish biomass in a no-take marine reserve. Aburto-Oropeza O; Erisman B; Galland GR; Mascareñas-Osorio I; Sala E; Ezcurra E PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23601. PubMed ID: 21858183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interaction of ecological and angler processes: experimental stocking in an open access, spatially structured fishery. Mee JA; Post JR; Ward H; Wilson KL; Newton E; Cantin A Ecol Appl; 2016 Sep; 26(6):1693-1707. PubMed ID: 27755695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Synergistic Effects of Marine Reserves and Harvest Controls on the Abundance and Catch Dynamics of a Coral Reef Fishery. Hopf JK; Jones GP; Williamson DH; Connolly SR Curr Biol; 2016 Jun; 26(12):1543-1548. PubMed ID: 27185553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A coupled recreational anglers' decision and fish population dynamics model. Fujiwara M; Backstrom JD; Woodward RT PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206537. PubMed ID: 30379924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying recreational shore angling catch and harvest in southern Portugal (north-east Atlantic Ocean): implications for conservation and integrated fisheries management. Veiga P; Ribeiro J; Gonçalves JM; Erzini K J Fish Biol; 2010 Jun; 76(9):2216-37. PubMed ID: 20557660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of regional angling effort, angler behavior, and harvesting efficiency on landscape patterns of overfishing. Hunt LM; Arlinghaus R; Lester N; Kushneriuk R Ecol Appl; 2011 Oct; 21(7):2555-75. PubMed ID: 22073644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial assessment of fishing effort around European marine reserves: implications for successful fisheries management. Stelzenmüller V; Maynou F; Bernard G; Cadiou G; Camilleri M; Crec'hriou R; Criquet G; Dimech M; Esparza O; Higgins R; Lenfant P; Pérez-Ruzafa A Mar Pollut Bull; 2008 Dec; 56(12):2018-26. PubMed ID: 18809184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Designing connected marine reserves in the face of global warming. Álvarez-Romero JG; Munguía-Vega A; Beger M; Del Mar Mancha-Cisneros M; Suárez-Castillo AN; Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Gerber LR; Morzaria-Luna HN; Reyes-Bonilla H; Adams VM; Kolb M; Graham EM; VanDerWal J; Castillo-López A; Hinojosa-Arango G; Petatán-Ramírez D; Moreno-Baez M; Godínez-Reyes CR; Torre J Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):e671-e691. PubMed ID: 29274104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of marine reserves in achieving sustainable fisheries. Roberts CM; Hawkins JP; Gell FR Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Jan; 360(1453):123-32. PubMed ID: 15713592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]