These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22612162)

  • 21. Learning categories via rules and similarity: comparing adults and children.
    Rabi R; Miles SJ; Minda JP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Mar; 131():149-69. PubMed ID: 25558860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The dual effect of context on memory of related and unrelated themes: discrimination at encoding and cue at retrieval.
    Levy-Gigi E; Vakil E
    Memory; 2012; 20(7):728-41. PubMed ID: 22809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the interaction of prior knowledge and stimulus structure in category learning.
    Livingston KR; Andrews JK
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):208-36. PubMed ID: 7754083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Epistemic states and traits: preschoolers appreciate the differential informativeness of situation-specific and person-specific cues to knowledge.
    Brosseau-Liard PE; Birch SA
    Child Dev; 2011; 82(6):1788-96. PubMed ID: 22004452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Category inference as a function of correlational structure, category discriminability, and number of available cues.
    Lancaster ME; Shelhamer R; Homa D
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):339-53. PubMed ID: 23192309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prior knowledge enhances the category dimensionality effect.
    Hoffman AB; Harris HD; Murphy GL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 18426059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the "enemy of induction"?
    Kornell N; Bjork RA
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 18578849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. People, clothing, music, and arousal as contextual retrieval cues in verbal memory.
    Standing LG; Bobbitt KE; Boisvert KL; Dayholos KN; Gagnon AM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):523-34. PubMed ID: 19093614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adaptive categorization in unsupervised learning.
    Clapper JP; Bower GH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):908-923. PubMed ID: 12219798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Altering object representations through category learning.
    Goldstone RL; Lippa Y; Shiffrin RM
    Cognition; 2001 Jan; 78(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 11062321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adapting to test structure: letting testing teach what to learn.
    Garcia-Marques L; Nunes LD; Marques P; Carneiro P; Weinstein Y
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):365-80. PubMed ID: 24568583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. When does prior knowledge disproportionately benefit older adults' memory?
    Badham SP; Hay M; Foxon N; Kaur K; Maylor EA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2016; 23(3):338-65. PubMed ID: 26473767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):662-79. PubMed ID: 18444763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Putting together prior knowledge, verbal arguments, and observations in category learning.
    Heit E
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Sep; 29(6):828-37. PubMed ID: 11716056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Operativity and the superordinate categorization of artifacts.
    Ricco RB; Beilin H
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1992 Dec; 54(3):334-54. PubMed ID: 1453137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Categorization reaction time, category structure, and category size in semantic memory using artificial categories.
    Casey PJ; Heath RA
    Mem Cognit; 1983 May; 11(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 6621338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Novel Labels Increase Category Coherence, But Only When People Have the Goal to Coordinate.
    Suffill E; Branigan H; Pickering M
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Nov; 43(11):e12796. PubMed ID: 31742758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries.
    Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aging and memory as discrimination: Influences of encoding specificity, cue overload, and prior knowledge.
    Badham SP; Poirier M; Gandhi N; Hadjivassiliou A; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Nov; 31(7):758-770. PubMed ID: 27831714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.