These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22612328)
21. [Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions]. Eusop E; Sebban C; Piette F Encephale; 2001; 27(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11294037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Finding the target in search tasks using detection, localization, and identification responses. Dukewich KR; Klein RM Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19271810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Covert processing of visual form in the absence of area LO. Kentridge RW; Heywood CA; Milner AD Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1488-95. PubMed ID: 15246286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance. Levinthal BR; Lleras A J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Project DyAdd: visual attention in adult dyslexia and ADHD. Laasonen M; Salomaa J; Cousineau D; Leppämäki S; Tani P; Hokkanen L; Dye M Brain Cogn; 2012 Dec; 80(3):311-27. PubMed ID: 23043869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sustained attention to local and global target features is different: performance and tympanic membrane temperature. Helton WS; Hayrynen L; Schaeffer D Brain Cogn; 2009 Oct; 71(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19329239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Temporal parameters of the feature positive effect. Nallan GB; Pace GM; McCoy DF; Zentall TR Am J Psychol; 1979 Dec; 92(4):703-10. PubMed ID: 532834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching. Druey MD; Hübner R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of spatial neglect using computerised feature and conjunction visual search tasks. Erez AB; Katz N; Ring H; Soroker N Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2009 Oct; 19(5):677-95. PubMed ID: 19259851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reducing the feature positive effect by alerting people to its existence. Rassin EG Learn Behav; 2014 Dec; 42(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 24984818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Integration of perceptual information in word access. Richter T; Zwaan RA Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 19424906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of implantation age on visual attention skills. Yucel E; Derim D Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 72(6):869-77. PubMed ID: 18395272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Large visuospatial sex difference in line judgment: possible role of attentional factors. Collaer ML; Nelson JD Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 12027388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Visual feature integration with an attention deficit. Arguin M; Cavanagh P; Joanette Y Brain Cogn; 1994 Jan; 24(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 8123263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]