BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22612406)

  • 1. Explaining variation in perceived team effectiveness: results from eleven quality improvement collaboratives.
    Strating MM; Nieboer AP
    J Clin Nurs; 2013 Jun; 22(11-12):1692-706. PubMed ID: 22612406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality improvement in long-term mental health: results from four collaboratives.
    Strating MM; Broer T; van Rooijen S; Bal RA; Nieboer AP
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2012 Jun; 19(5):379-88. PubMed ID: 22070667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A large-scale longitudinal study indicating the importance of perceived effectiveness, organizational and management support for innovative culture.
    Cramm JM; Strating MM; Bal R; Nieboer AP
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Apr; 83():119-24. PubMed ID: 23415046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determinants of success of quality improvement collaboratives: what does the literature show?
    Hulscher ME; Schouten LM; Grol RP; Buchan H
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Jan; 22(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 22879447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coaching interprofessional health care improvement teams: the coachee, the coach and the leader perspectives.
    Godfrey MM; Andersson-Gare B; Nelson EC; Nilsson M; Ahlstrom G
    J Nurs Manag; 2014 May; 22(4):452-64. PubMed ID: 23782339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Creating effective quality-improvement collaboratives: a multiple case study.
    Strating MM; Nieboer AP; Zuiderent-Jerak T; Bal RA
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2011 Apr; 20(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 21270070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review.
    Zamboni K; Baker U; Tyagi M; Schellenberg J; Hill Z; Hanson C
    Implement Sci; 2020 May; 15(1):27. PubMed ID: 32366269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with the impact of quality improvement collaboratives in mental healthcare: an exploratory study.
    Versteeg MH; Laurant MG; Franx GC; Jacobs AJ; Wensing MJ
    Implement Sci; 2012 Jan; 7():1. PubMed ID: 22230594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving primary care in Australia through the Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program: a quality improvement report.
    Knight AW; Caesar C; Ford D; Coughlin A; Frick C
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Nov; 21(11):948-55. PubMed ID: 22791694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of successful quality improvement teams: lessons from five collaborative projects in the VHA.
    Mills PD; Weeks WB
    Jt Comm J Qual Saf; 2004 Mar; 30(3):152-62. PubMed ID: 15032072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Redesigning the system from the bottom up: lessons learned from a decade of federal quality improvement collaboratives.
    Harris Y; Kwon L; Berrian A; Calvo A
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2012 Aug; 23(3 Suppl):11-20. PubMed ID: 22864484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transferring skills in quality collaboratives focused on improving patient logistics.
    Weggelaar-Jansen AM; van Wijngaarden J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 18(1):224. PubMed ID: 29606124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Helping primary care teams emerge through a quality improvement program.
    Hilts L; Howard M; Price D; Risdon C; Agarwal G; Childs A
    Fam Pract; 2013 Apr; 30(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 22990026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-depth comparison of two quality improvement collaboratives from different healthcare areas based on registry data-possible factors contributing to sustained improvement in outcomes beyond the project time.
    Algurén B; Nordin A; Andersson-Gäre B; Peterson A
    Implement Sci; 2019 Jul; 14(1):74. PubMed ID: 31337394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do learning collaboratives strengthen communication? A comparison of organizational team communication networks over time.
    Bunger AC; Lengnick-Hall R
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2018; 43(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 27529402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Team safety and innovation by learning from errors in long-term care settings.
    Buljac-Samardžić M; van Woerkom M; Paauwe J
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2012; 37(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 22008722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosing and improving functioning in interdisciplinary health care teams.
    Blackmore G; Persaud DD
    Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2012; 31(3):195-207. PubMed ID: 22842755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Promise and challenges of maternal health collaboratives.
    Louis JM
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 58(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 25851849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.