These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22612634)

  • 1. Using individual differences to predict job performance: correcting for direct and indirect restriction of range.
    Sjöberg S; Sjöberg A; Näswall K; Sverke M
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 22612634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings.
    Hunter JE; Schmidt FL; Le H
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):594-612. PubMed ID: 16737357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community.
    Salgado JF; Anderson N; Moscoso S; Bertua C; de Fruyt F; Rolland JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Dec; 88(6):1068-81. PubMed ID: 14640817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Campbell JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 20919794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance.
    Gonzalez-Mulé E; Mount MK; Oh IS
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Nov; 99(6):1222-43. PubMed ID: 25133304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis.
    Chiaburu DS; Oh IS; Berry CM; Li N; Gardner RG
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1140-66. PubMed ID: 21688883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: a meta-analysis.
    Oh IS; Wang G; Mount MK
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jul; 96(4):762-73. PubMed ID: 21142341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personality and citizenship behavior: the mediating role of job satisfaction.
    Ilies R; Fulmer IS; Spitzmuller M; Johnson MD
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):945-59. PubMed ID: 19594236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Putka DJ; Lanivich SE
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1167-94. PubMed ID: 21744941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: testing a new meta-analytic procedure.
    Le H; Schmidt FL
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):416-38. PubMed ID: 17154755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives.
    Judge TA; Rodell JB; Klinger RL; Simon LS; Crawford ER
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Nov; 98(6):875-925. PubMed ID: 24016206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):499-530. PubMed ID: 21319880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The five-factor model of personality and managerial performance: validity gains through the use of 360 degree performance ratings.
    Oh IS; Berry CM
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Nov; 94(6):1498-513. PubMed ID: 19916658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the relation between personality and job performance of airline pilots.
    Hormann HJ; Maschke P
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 11762439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences and stress-performance relationship.
    Kazmi R; Amjad S; Khan D
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2009; 21(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 20929041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Situation assessment as an ignored factor in the behavioral consistency paradigm underlying the validity of personnel selection procedures.
    Jansen A; Melchers KG; Lievens F; Kleinmann M; Brändli M; Fraefel L; König CJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Mar; 98(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 23244223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Personnel selection: looking toward the future--remembering the past.
    Hough LM; Oswald FL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2000; 51():631-64. PubMed ID: 10751983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The honeymoon effect in job performance: temporal increases in the predictive power of achievement motivation.
    Helmreich RL; Sawin LL; Carsrud AL
    J Appl Psychol; 1986; 71(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 11538825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Too much of a good thing: curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance.
    Le H; Oh IS; Robbins SB; Ilies R; Holland E; Westrick P
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):113-33. PubMed ID: 20939656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The big five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages.
    Thoresen CJ; Bradley JC; Bliese PD; Thoresen JD
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(5):835-53. PubMed ID: 15506864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.