BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22613524)

  • 1. Randomized study on the safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography in.
    Liu HL; Jin ZG; Yang SL; Luo JP; Ma DX; Liu Y; Han W
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Mar; 125(6):1016-22. PubMed ID: 22613524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography.
    Klein AJ; Garcia JA; Hudson PA; Kim MS; Messenger JC; Casserly IP; Wink O; Hattler B; Tsai TT; Chen SY; Hansgen A; Carroll JD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 77(6):820-7. PubMed ID: 20853352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial clinical experience of selective coronary angiography using one prolonged injection and a 180 degrees rotational trajectory.
    Garcia JA; Chen SY; Messenger JC; Casserly IP; Hansgen A; Wink O; Movassaghi B; Klein AJ; Carroll JD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Aug; 70(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 17295325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography.
    Jin ZG; Bai R; Li Y; Yang Y; Han W; Zhao Q; Zhang L; Liu HL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 31628576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a safety strategy using transradial access and dual-axis rotational coronary angiography with transfemoral access and standard coronary angiography.
    Yasar AS; Perino AC; Dattilo PB; Casserly IP; Carroll JD; Messenger JC
    J Interv Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 26(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 23952684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized trial comparing dual axis rotational versus conventional coronary angiography in a population with a high prevalence of coronary artery disease.
    Giuberti RS; Caixeta A; Carvalho AC; Soares MM; Abreu-Silva EO; Pestana JO; Silva Júnior HT; Vaz ML; Généreux P; Fernandes RW
    J Interv Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 27(5):456-64. PubMed ID: 25132588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Dual-Axis Rotational Coronary Angiography Radiation Dose Reduction Achievable in a Population with 100% Suspected Coronary Artery Disease? A Randomized Trial.
    Szarfer J; Albornoz F; Alonso A; Yurko V; Blanco F; Blanco R; Indavere A; Gigena G; Gagliardi J; Escudero AG
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2020 Jun; 51(2):241-246. PubMed ID: 31980416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Effect of Dual-Axis Rotational Coronary Angiography Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography on Frequency of Acute Kidney Injury, X-Ray Exposure Time, and Quantity of Contrast Medium Injected.
    Di Serafino L; Turturo M; Lanzone S; Marano M; Scognamiglio G; Trimarco B; Cirillo P; Esposito G; D'Agostino C
    Am J Cardiol; 2018 May; 121(9):1046-1050. PubMed ID: 29519544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining Optimized Image Processing With Dual Axis Rotational Angiography: Toward Low-Dose Invasive Coronary Angiography.
    Buytaert D; Drieghe B; Van Heuverswyn F; De Pooter J; Gheeraert P; De Wolf D; Taeymans Y; Bacher K
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Jul; 9(13):e014683. PubMed ID: 32605408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in routine clinical practice.
    Farshid A; Chandrasekhar J; McLean D
    Heart Vessels; 2014 Mar; 29(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 23615833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice.
    Gómez-Menchero AE; Díaz JF; Sánchez-González C; Cardenal R; Sanghvi AB; Roa-Garrido J; Rodríguez-López JL
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2012 May; 65(5):434-9. PubMed ID: 22465608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis.
    Garcia JA; Agostoni P; Green NE; Maddux JT; Chen SY; Messenger JC; Casserly IP; Hansgen A; Wink O; Movassaghi B; Groves BM; Van Den Heuvel P; Verheye S; Van Langenhove G; Vermeersch P; Van den Branden F; Yeghiazarians Y; Michaels AD; Carroll JD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 May; 73(6):753-61. PubMed ID: 19180661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Maddux JT; Wink O; Messenger JC; Groves BM; Liao R; Strzelczyk J; Chen SY; Carroll JD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Jun; 62(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 15170705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational vs. standard coronary angiography using a flat-panel detector.
    Akhtar M; Vakharia KT; Mishell J; Gera A; Ports TA; Yeghiazarians Y; Michaels AD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Sep; 66(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16082684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography can reduce peak skin dose and scattered dose: a phantom study.
    Liu H; Jin Z; Deng Y; Jing L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4805. PubMed ID: 25207409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Rotational coronary angiography].
    Smida W; Sidéris G; Stratiev V; Logeart D; Ouadhour A; Tarragano F; Bonnevie L; Azancot I; Henry P
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2007 Nov; 100(11):895-900. PubMed ID: 18209689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography: a randomized comparison.
    Hell MM; Gilg MD; Röther J; Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Schlundt C
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Feb; 110(2):258-269. PubMed ID: 32936322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coronary lesions quantification with dual-axis rotational coronary angiography.
    Unzué Vallejo L; Delcán Domínguez JL; Alegría Barrero A; Medina Peralta J; Rodríguez Rodrigo FJ; Rodríguez-López JL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 23218798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation and contrast agent doses reductions by using 80-kV tube voltage in coronary computed tomographic angiography: a comparative study.
    Cao JX; Wang YM; Lu JG; Zhang Y; Wang P; Yang C
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 24315475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography.
    Grech M; Debono J; Xuereb RG; Fenech A; Grech V
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 80(4):576-80. PubMed ID: 22105940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.