These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22613779)

  • 1. Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; de Blaeij TJ; Meulenbroek AJ; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 22613779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different interpretation strategies for low template DNA mixtures.
    Pfeifer CM; Klein-Unseld R; Klintschar M; Wiegand P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 22739132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results.
    Benschop CC; van der Beek CP; Meiland HC; van Gorp AG; Westen AA; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):316-28. PubMed ID: 20655289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consensus and pool profiles to assist in the analysis and interpretation of complex low template DNA mixtures.
    Benschop C; Haned H; Sijen T
    Int J Legal Med; 2013 Jan; 127(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 22131037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the stochastic threshold, back- and forward stutter filters and low template techniques for NGM.
    Westen AA; Grol LJ; Harteveld J; Matai AS; de Knijff P; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 22633964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of STR profiles from firearms and fired cartridge cases.
    Horsman-Hall KM; Orihuela Y; Karczynski SL; Davis AL; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 19647709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extended PCR conditions to reduce drop-out frequencies in low template STR typing including unequal mixtures.
    Weiler NE; Matai AS; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21454145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
    Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of samples comprising minute amounts of DNA.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; Yoo SY; Sijen T
    Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 26385713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
    Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
    Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation of the robustness of the consensus method of interpreting low-template DNA profiles.
    Cowen S; Debenham P; Dixon A; Kutranov S; Thomson J; Way K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):400-6. PubMed ID: 20952266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The interpretation of low level DNA mixtures.
    Kelly H; Bright JA; Curran J; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 21570375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.