These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22613779)

  • 21. Joint Bayesian analysis of forensic mixtures.
    Pascali VL; Merigioli S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):735-48. PubMed ID: 22948016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles.
    Gill P; Kirkham A; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Mar; 166(2-3):128-38. PubMed ID: 16759831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A protocol for direct and rapid multiplex PCR amplification on forensically relevant samples.
    Verheij S; Harteveld J; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 21530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. DNA mixtures interpretation - A proof-of-concept multi-software comparison highlighting different probabilistic methods' performances on challenging samples.
    Alladio E; Omedei M; Cisana S; D'Amico G; Caneparo D; Vincenti M; Garofano P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():143-150. PubMed ID: 30173123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.
    Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35277229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.
    Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data?
    Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():13-16. PubMed ID: 25474687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An inter-laboratory comparison of probabilistic genotyping parameters and evaluation of performance on DNA mixtures from different laboratories.
    Boodoosingh S; Kelly H; Curran JM; Kalafut T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103046. PubMed ID: 38598920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis.
    Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Cheng K; Budowle B; Coble MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():172-179. PubMed ID: 30176439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validating TrueAllele
    Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
    Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Simplified low-copy-number DNA analysis by post-PCR purification.
    Smith PJ; Ballantyne J
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):820-9. PubMed ID: 17553095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count?
    Haned H; Pène L; Lobry JR; Dufour AB; Pontier D
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20840286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of an STR peak area model.
    Cowell RG
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Jun; 3(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19414168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An integrated system of ABO typing and multiplex STR testing for forensic DNA analysis.
    Jiang X; He J; Jia F; Shen H; Zhao J; Chen C; Bai L; Liu F; Hou G; Guo F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):785-97. PubMed ID: 22516188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
    Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Verifying likelihoods for low template DNA profiles using multiple replicates.
    Steele CD; Greenhalgh M; Balding DJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():82-9. PubMed ID: 25082140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
    Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.