These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22614266)

  • 1. Comparison of the clinical outcome in overweight or obese patients after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Feng Zhang Z; Qing Li C; Jie Zheng W; Liu J
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jun; 27(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 22614266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
    Eur Spine J; 2011 Apr; 20(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 20927557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1780-4. PubMed ID: 20411281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis.
    Hammad A; Wirries A; Ardeshiri A; Nikiforov O; Geiger F
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jul; 14(1):229. PubMed ID: 31331364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical study on lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Ren XJ; Chu TW; Wang WD; Zheng WJ; Pan Y; Huang B
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 49(12):1076-80. PubMed ID: 22333446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Droeghaag R; Hermans SMM; Caelers IJMH; Evers SMAA; van Hemert WLW; van Santbrink H
    Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):945-954. PubMed ID: 33493680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
    Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Be Better Than Open Surgery for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
    Tian W; Xu YF; Liu B; Liu YJ; He D; Yuan Q; Lang Z; Han XG
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):237-242. PubMed ID: 28632545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery.
    Brodano GB; Martikos K; Lolli F; Gasbarrini A; Cioni A; Bandiera S; Silvestre MD; Boriani S; Greggi T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):E559-64. PubMed ID: 24136060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How High Are Radiation-related Risks in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Traditional Open Surgery?: A Meta-analysis and Dose Estimates of Ionizing Radiation.
    Kim CH; Lee CH; Kim KP
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 26889987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.
    Lau D; Khan A; Terman SW; Yee T; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E10. PubMed ID: 23905948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Cui GY; Tian W; He D; Xing YG; Liu B; Yuan Q; Wang YQ; Sun YQ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):543-548. PubMed ID: 28655085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
    Qi Q; Xiao Q; Deng L; Li C; Dong X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.
    Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Sharma A; Reddy M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E12. PubMed ID: 28760034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Minimally invasive dorsal decompression-stabilization surgery in patients with overweight and obesity].
    Byval'tsev VA; Kalinin AA
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2018; 82(5):69-80. PubMed ID: 30412159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.